Revolt Against Illiana Undeterred By IDOT’s Latest Scare Tactic

Will County board member Regan Freitag
Board member Regan Freitag of Will County, telling the CMAP policy committee last year that the Illiana Tollway would destroy prime farmland in Will County and disrupt local access by slicing across many existing roads.

Local advocates are scoffing at the suggestion, made by an Illinois Department of Transportation representative last week, that striking the Illiana Tollway from the Chicago region’s long-term regional plan would jeopardize transportation spending across the entire region. Instead, advocates insist that deleting the costly, sprawl-inducing road would cause at most a brief procedural delay in other projects, and ultimately free up millions of dollars for more urgent priorities.

Bruce Carmichael from IDOT made this claim at a CMAP transportation committee meeting last week. He said that, if the CMAP board votes to delete the Illiana from the GO TO 2040 regional plan on October 8, the revised plan would need a fresh review. The entire plan would be temporarily invalidated while that “conformity analysis” and public comment period is underway. While Carmichael is correct on that point, the analysis would cause at most a brief delay that would not necessarily disrupt any projects in progress.

Carmichael said that, while the revised plan is being reviewed, the federal government would stop sending checks that pay for already-approved projects. For example, the Chicago Department of Transportation and the Chicago Transit Authority would be unable to be reimbursed for building new bike lanes and buying new train cars.

Metropolitan Planning Council vice president Peter Skosey confirmed with the committee’s Federal Highway Administration representative that the review would not, in fact, interfere with FHWA’s payments. The FHWA is scheduled to send its next round of checks just before the joint meeting on October 8, and “those dollars will continue to come to us,” Skosey told me.

Randy Neufeld, also a member of the transportation committee, said that the conformity analysis would take all of one day to ensure that the altered GO TO 2040 complies with federal air quality regulations. CMAP would then launch a 30-day public comment period. Skosey said that CMAP could complete the entire review in less than two months, and adopt the final plan in November — well before the next FHWA payment period.

Kyle Smith of the Center for Neighborhood Technology thinks that public comments would side with a revised, Illiana-free plan, anyways. “The removal of the Illiana,” Smith explained to me, “would be justified by the hundreds of public comments against it” that have been received so far. People who wrote into CMAP overwhelmingly opposed the 47-mile tollway, saying it would destroy heritage farmland and shift $250 million in public funds from worthier projects. Earlier, we’ve also cited how tollways across the country have been built on faulty traffic projections, leading to default – which in this case would leave the fiscally-strapped state on the hook for over $1 billion.

Smith continued, saying that “it should be the nature of a public agency to listen to those comments, and remove the project from the plan.” He relayed that another IDOT representative said at the meeting: “[Pete Harmet] suggested public comments don’t capture support for or against the expressway, and were not relevant for this decision.”

Neufeld said that the October meeting’s outcome “all boils down to votes.” If the votes are there to remove the Illiana Tollway from GO TO 2040, “then the procedural stuff doesn’t matter, and the time constraints really aren’t an issue.” He clarified that the Illiana Tollway was added to GO TO 2040 a year ago via an amendment, and that an amendment could just as easily take it out. “It’s just whether or not there’s majority support for that,” Neufeld said.

Neufeld congratulated the “progress on multi-modal efforts at IDOT,” citing the first ever statewide bike plan, but adds that “they’re also a creature of the governor, and the governor wants Illiana.”

CMAP is expecting many people to speak up about the plan update at the joint meeting on October 8. They’ve dedicated one hour of the 9 a.m. meeting to comments, where they’ll hear sixty people speak. They’re also taking comments via email and their online form, until this Thursday, October 2, at 5 p.m.

  • duppie

    Quinn clearly wants this. Does anyony know Rauner’s standpoint?

  • Wewilliewinkleman

    Follow the money. What major land owners, contractors, local and state pols and their friends will reap the windfall? Peotone should be a sterling example. Party doesn’t matter as both scratch each others backs in Illinois.

  • Roland Solinski

    Only Rauner himself. Dude is playing his cards WAY close to the vest on this issue (on most issues, to be honest).

  • hello

    I might vote for Rauner if we were staunchly against this, (presuming he won’t get any “crazy” policies through the house) but he won’t take a stand – doesn’t want to alienate the road construction workers might vote for him.

  • BlueFairlane

    I think Rauner’s got much more to lose by taking a stand against this than he does to gain. And my own take is that it would be an odd aberration in his general political attitude to be against this, anyway. Road-building is among the only things his ilk thinks government should be doing.

  • Wewilliewinkleman

    Its not the workers. Its the construction companies and their subcontractors who kick in the campaign contibution to the pols that put their friends and relatives in power positions in state agencies. How much money do you think Catapilar, which builds road building equipment, contributes to these campaigns. They’re more important than the flag waver on a highway project.

  • NorthSure

    Rauner’s a neoliberal with no great love for the blue-collar types the Illiana would allegedly help, and he’s good buddies with Rahm, who HATES this. He’ll be agnostic on this subject during the campaign unless somebody tries to pin him down, and then let it die a quiet death after he wins. For once I can’t argue with them.

  • BlueFairlane

    It is politically beneficial to Rahm to hate this, as it fits the narrative he’s constructed, and hating it doesn’t cost him many voters. The Illiana, meanwhile, has nothing to do with labor and everything to do with the big business interests who want an airport in Peotone. The theoretical public-private partnership meets Rauner’s neoliberalism needs, allowing government to build something that he can say benefits business without much risk to those businesses.

    The Illiana is just as likely to happen under Rauner as it is under Quinn.

  • miceman

    You mean like OZINGA,

  • Wewilliewinkleman

    Yeah, to name another. Ozinga is a good one.

  • FG

    At least Quinn is pushing the Englewood Flyover to completion before the election.

  • It’s open now! Metra started running revenue service trains over it last week.


Seven Ways to Stop The Illiana Boondoggle

Two votes yesterday by a committee of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, Chicagoland’s federally-designated regional planning organization, have cemented CMAP’s approval of the sprawl-inducing, budget-busting Illiana Tollway. Since federal transportation dollars can only be spent on projects included in an adopted regional plan, this gives Governor Pat Quinn and the Illinois Department of Transportation the consent […]

Environmental Groups Charge Illiana Illegally Bypassed CMAP

The Illiana Expressway encountered a potential roadblock in the form of a lawsuit filed last Thursday. Three environmental groups filed the lawsuit: the Environmental Law & Policy Center, representing Openlands and the Sierra Club. The lawsuit [PDF] alleges that IDOT circumvented the proper approval process to get the tollway past a crucial review. On October […]

Preckwinkle, Environmental Groups Want CMAP to Drop Illiana

The Sierra Club and other organizations intend to petition the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning to remove the Illiana Tollway from its regional plan, effectively disallowing the state from building the new highway. The deletion is possible because CMAP, the federally-designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for this region, is finalizing a mandatory update of its GO […]

How IDOT’s Bogus Job Creation Claims Fed the Campaign for the Illiana

The Illinois Department of Transportation made its case for the Illiana tollway proposal by disseminating half truths and outright lies. At a Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning committee meeting in October where members voted 10-8 in favor of the 47-mile highway, supporters repeatedly referred to IDOT’s claim that the project would create 28,000 jobs. But […]