Transit Future Slowly Building Coalition to Fund Expanded Transit

CNT says there is poor transit service between where low-income workers live and where most jobs are. They're developing research that would show the impact of building new lines outlined in the Transit Future campaign.
CNT says there is poor transit service between where low-income workers live and where most jobs are. They’re developing research that would show the impact of building new lines outlined in the Transit Future campaign.

The Transit Future campaign sure did arrive with a bang. Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Cook County President Toni Preckwinkle both spoke at its April announcement, which was accompanied by a splashy map and website. It seemed like a huge expansion of the region’s transit network was closer than ever, once Cook County and Chicago officials rallied around the idea (imported from Los Angeles) to use local taxes to leverage big dollars for projects. But ever since then, though, its backers — the Center for Neighborhood Technology and Active Transportation Alliance — have been fairly quiet.

CNT vice president Jacky Grimshaw and Active Trans executive director Ron Burke recently gave a glimpse into what’s next for Transit Future at DePaul University’s Chaddick Institute. Ever since its launch, 12 of Cook County’s 17 commissioners have signed on to the campaign. Several of them told Grimshaw that the campaign should also meet with mayors and other elected officials in their districts, so CNT has expanded its outreach accordingly.

“It’s important to build a coalition,” Grimshaw said, “to share the message and get the electorate involved.”

Grimshaw was candid about the progress of Transit Future since April, saying she had asked Cook County President Toni Preckwinkle to include a new transit fund within the FY2015 budget proposal. “But Toni had a bigger nut to crack,” Grimshaw said, “and that’s pensions.” (The current, election-year budget also, conveniently, does not include any new taxes.) Grimshaw added, “The best we can hope for now is the 2016 budget.”

The Transit Future map shows many new and extended ‘L’, Metra and arterial rapid bus routes. Grimshaw explained that “we didn’t just make up these lines.” Many of them were on the wish lists that transportation agencies, departments, and other governments had submitted to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, for potential inclusion in the GO TO 2040 comprehensive regional plan. The routes “were vetted, part of a public engagement process, and screened,” she added. “What these lines lacked is funding” (unlike some other projects), and so they weren’t included in the final GO TO 2040 plan.

Transit Future is developing a compelling public case for why these transit lines are needed. Campaign manager Ronnie Harris said that they’re racing to develop a report clearly showing the benefits and return on investment “of going ahead and doing this.” The report, he said, will “outline the benefits of [the region] buying into Transit Future.”

Cook County certainly could use more extensive transit service. County residents take transit for just seven percent of all trips, Burke explained, because it’s inconvenient for most of their trips. Transit service just isn’t available, or is infrequent, in the areas where most county residents work. Decades of sprawl have pushed jobs from downtown Chicago to newer centers, around O’Hare Airport and to suburban corridors in the north, northwest, and west suburbs. Getting to jobs in those locations is impractical by transit, since these transit deserts see only infrequent Pace buses and practically nonexistent reverse-commute Metra service to faraway stations.

Former LA mayor Antonio Villaraigosa speaking at the Transit Future campaign press conference
Former LA mayor Antonio Villaraigosa came to speak in favor of self-funded transit that can leverage decades worth of federal funds sooner.

Yet better transit could be transformative for these corridors, most of which are either located within or adjacent to Cook County. Better transit would cut travel times and travel costs for lower-income workers, Grimshaw said: “people are putting so much of their household income into cars, taking away the other things you can do with [that money].”

She added that “our current transit system is getting more and more costly to invest in,” as growing maintenance needs exceed available funding. The result has been frequent breakdowns, subpar and unreliable servicelackluster growth around transit, and excessive household spending on transportation. Burke pointed out that, among peer cities like Boston, San Francisco, Philadelphia, and New York City, “we are the last in ridership growth, system expansion, and building transit-friendly development.” Chicago is also second to last in per capita spending on transit — behind Los Angeles, which will soon surpass us.

Burke said “our roads are not going to expand to sufficiently meet the needs of two million more residents,” the area’s projected population growth by 2040. 80 percent of all trips today are made by car — and if two million more residents also make 80 percent of their trips by car, “that’s a lot of cars, a lot more congestion,” he said.

Harris said that CNT is also researching potential models to funding Transit Future. “Any option you can contemplate for raising funds is on the table,” he said, and as yet the campaign does not advocate any particular funding stream. He expects that the county commissioners will come up with their own solution.

Other challenges that Grimshaw identified included convincing people that Cook County can actually “live within its means,” a general distrust of political promises, and the challenge of raising revenue for infrastructure amidst a still-shaky economy.

The state’s continued push for more exurban roads certainly doesn’t help, either. Grimshaw suspects that, as the Illiana Tollway moves forward, a “bad bill” will inevitably appear to lavish millions more upon the private operator. “Call your legislator and ask them to vote ‘absolutely hell no’ ” if it comes up, she asked the audience.

The most important challenge, though, is to spread the word and build grassroots support. Burke took a cue from the Onion, pointing out that most drivers support transit for other people and said that most “drivers care about transit, too. They’re fed up with the roads.”

“We need to come to a ‘state of good repair,’ as well as a ‘state of good convenience.’ We need to care about our current customers as much as our future customers,” Burke said.

  • Roland Solinski

    Anyone notice how the locus of poor job accessibility seems to be Metra Electric? An improvement on that line, coupled with coordinated feeder bus service, could produce tremendous improvement, whether that’s CrossRail,
    Gold Line, Gray Line, etc.

  • I think I agree, but I need to study the map a little more. The people in the tan areas on the south side of Chicago and south suburbs need faster transit. I believe CrossRail is what would provide slightly faster transit (because it would eliminate the required transfer from Metra Electric to Metra MD-West/Schaumburg), although it’s still a very long and indirect ride. Yeah, feeder buses on the Schaumburg end that come more than once every 30 minutes would be good, but it’s still a really long journey!

  • Roland Solinski

    I agree, but the geographic distance between the South Side and O’Hare is huge. I don’t think it’s possible to make it fast; all you can do is improve the convenience.

    Also, downtown is still a massive jobs center as well, and more frequency on ME plus better downtown connections would improve jobs access for the south side without even linking them to an airport 30 miles away.

  • Coolebra

    Yes, we need to fix pensions. The writing is already on the wall: Short of bankruptcy, we can’t fix pensions by rolling back benefits to those we’ve already committed them. Thus, while we decrease the liability on a moving forward basis by reducing benefits for new employees, the accrued liability has to be paid.

    That likely means some combination of shifting existing revenues through program reductions and/or eliminations and raising new revenue. Of course, there’s very little appetite for raising taxes, but that’s a likely outcome. There are also efforts to increase the tax base, i.e., get more money through growth in the existing tax base, with or without any increase in the tax rate.

    What do we know about major transit investments and their return on investment?

    What would Cook County gain by boldly investing in a vision that connects people to jobs, including concentrations of low to moderate income people and families – a theme that echoes at the local, county, state, and national levels. Ladders of Opportunity? Yeah, we need them. Transportation is central to that goal.

    What would Cook County gain by becoming a place where people can choose not to have a car, or at least one less car?

    What if Cook County could begin to have less parking lots and more tax generating development?

    What if businesses increasingly chose to locate in Cook County due to its world class transit system and access to a quality workforce?

    Report after report touts the benefits of transit; however, we keep building roads. Why??

    These reports offer some insights:

    “The economic health of the region depends on how well we can meet this challenge”

    “While it may appear that a region’s inability to update its fare collection system or maintain its transit infrastructure in a state of good repair is the result of technological or funding barriers, the likelier cause is a governance structure that does not have the proper capacity to implement changes or make pragmatic investment decisions.”

    “It has too many gaps, so it’s hard to get around Chicagoland. It doesn’t connect enough people to job centers. In too many places, driving is the only way to go—that means more traffic and pollution.”

    We need a vision and a pathway to get there. We’ve wandered the wilderness long enough.

  • Coolebra

    The proposed Inner-Circumferential Line, running between Midway and O’Hare through west Cook could help. It was among the best scoring projects when GoTo 2040 was drafted, though it ended up on the scrap heap like many other necessary transit investments.

  • Your “What would” and “What if” Cook County questions are the ones I hope Ronnie et. al. at CNT are working on right now.

  • Coolebra

    Indeed – benefits have to be clearly articulated. Otherwise, transit amounts to yet another cost that we can’t handle on top of the crisis of the day – pensions, for now.


CNT and Active Trans Launch “Transit Future” Funding Campaign

On Monday, Governor Quinn’s Northeast Illinois Public Transit Taskforce released its final report, underscoring the need for better funding for regional transit. Yesterday, the Center for Neighborhood Technology and the Active Transportation Alliance launched a new campaign, dubbed “Transit Future,” to raise that money via a new Cook County-based revenue stream that would help the […]

Three Transit Campaigns: Do They Compete or Complement Each Other?

As the Chicago region grows in population, we’re going to need to provide efficient and affordable transportation options in order to compete in the global economy, and that’s going to require more and better transit. People who live near transit pay less in transportation costs as a portion of their household income, and have better access […]

Some Bus Service Will Be Better In 2016, But Better Funding Needed

2016 just might be the year of the Chicago bus. The Chicago Transit Authority is restoring express service and speeding up local service on Ashland and Western avenues, running six bus routes on dedicated bus lanes downtown with the new “Loop Link” corridor, and piloting restored service on the #11-Lincoln and #31-31st Street bus routes. Pace will also […]