Skip to Content
Streetsblog Chicago home
Streetsblog Chicago home
Log In
Design

Sick Byrne! Twitter account for the $800M+ interchange expansion gets brutally ratioed

6:21 PM CST on December 21, 2022

What would the late Mayor Jane Byrne (the one on the right) think of all this? Photo: Steve Kagan via @Chicago_History

Has there ever been a worse expenditure of the better part of a billion dollars in Chicago than the Jane Byrne Interchange expansion project?

On December 14, Governor J.B. Pritzker cut the ribbon on the massive expressway "spaghetti bowl" enlargement in the West Loop. The initiative has cost $806.4 million so far, 51 percent higher than the $535 million estimated when construction began in 2013. That's 12.6 times as expensive as the $64 million Navy Pier Flyover bike-pedestrian bridge, Illinois' priciest cycling project. The work has also taken five years longer than originally projected.

The Illinois Department of Transportation is trying sell this giant expenditure for drivers as something that will result in more efficient, safer, and even greener transportation. "The finished product is predicted to result in a 50 percent reduction in vehicle delays, saving motorists an annual 5 million hours previously spent sitting in traffic and $185 million in productivity," IDOT said in a news release. "Vehicle emissions are anticipated to reduce by a third, with annual gas consumption decreasing by 1.6 million gallons a year. Crashes are predicted to go down 25 percent."

The Jane Byrne Interchange. Photo: IDOT
The Jane Byrne Interchange. Photo: IDOT
The Jane Byrne Interchange. Photo: IDOT

Those rose-colored projections are highly dubious. Analysis by Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning prior to the project's approval in by CMAP in 2013 (which ignored the agency's own findings) noted that none of those kinds of improvements were guaranteed and warned that the project would lead to more car trips, more carbon emissions, and fewer transit trips. The interchange expansion was projected to convert 1,000 trips from transit to driving and increase carbon dioxide emissions by 39,000 metric tons each year. Moreover, CMAP predicted that drivers in the region would save a mere 1.2 seconds per trip if the project was built.

At the time, then-Active Transportation Alliance Executive Director Ron Burke noted that the interchange project was a poor way to achieve transportation goals. “If you really want to address congestion in a long-term sustainable way, we need to give people alternatives to driving, especially driving alone,” he said. "We’re concerned about this emphasis on highway expansion at a time when the experience in Chicagoland and other areas shows us that it is, at best, a short-term solution to roadway congestion. In general it perpetuates land use and travel patterns that make us auto dependent creating a negative feedback loop."

Chicago Critical Mass rides on an access ramp of the interchange during the 25th anniversary ride last September. Photo: John Greenfield
Chicago Critical Mass rides on an access ramp of the interchange during the 25th anniversary ride last September. Photo: John Greenfield
Chicago Critical Mass rides on an access ramp of the interchange during the 25th anniversary ride last September. Photo: John Greenfield

And then there's the cautionary tale of the $105 million project to “fix” the west-suburban Hillside Strangler bottleneck in the early 2000s. That was a textbook example of how throwing money at road expansion projects does little or nothing to prevent traffic jams. When you make more room for cars on highways, more people choose to drive – a phenomenon known as induced demand – and thus the effect on congestion is negligible. As with the Strangler "improvements," any congestion reduction from the opening of the Jane Byrne will likely be limited to a few weeks or months.

Nonetheless, today the Twitter account for the Jane Byrne Express, presumably run by IDOT, celebrated its official opening with this cheeky tweet.

pic.twitter.com/mfHtcnnuYM

— Microsoft Outlook Hate Account (@Disco_Meatball) December 21, 2022

Not entirely surprising from a city that thinks this is a good use of a downtown lakefront... pic.twitter.com/4szlLTnv3h

— Finlay Knops-Mckim 🚲 (@FinKnopsMckim) December 21, 2022

Pretending that a new freeway interchange is bringing America’s other great transit city ‘into the 21st century’ is ludicrous. Maybe they should have used #IDIOT instead of #IDOT. https://t.co/Q5o0xzkkog

— The Red Line Podcast (@TheRedLine_pod) December 21, 2022

There's a lot more insightful commentary, as well as comedy gold, to explore in the thread. Maybe IDOT will think twice next time before telling Chicagoans to "move over" to make way for cars.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog Chicago

Should a Streetsblog reader “Surrender” to commuting from Rockford to Chicago?

We compare the strengths and weaknesses of driving, and/or riding the train or bus, from the Forest City to the Windy City.

February 23, 2024

Metra orders battery-powered trains, gets funding for new bilevel passenger cars

As Metra's board authorized the purchase of eight battery-powered Stadler train sets, the FTA announced the railroad will get $100M to purchase 50 bi-level rail cars.

February 22, 2024

Good karma for a pickup truck driver: Motorist helps save an endangered Green Line rider from serious injury

It was chicken soup for the sustainable transportation reporter's soul to hear of a quick-thinking motorist protecting a CTA user from grievous harm.

February 21, 2024
See all posts