Divvy Will Add 40 More Stations This Year, Increasing Density in Underserved Areas

A Divvy station in Austin, which got its first stations last year, spaced about a quarter mile from each other. Photo: John Greenfield
A Divvy station in Austin, which got its first stations last year, spaced about a quarter mile from each other. Photo: John Greenfield

While the Divvy system serves a large percentage of our city’s square mileage, as well as serving the suburbs of Evanston and Oak Park, it’s currently a lot more useful in some Chicago neighborhoods than others. That’s because when the system debuted four years ago, the Chicago Department of Transportation installed a higher number of stations in neighborhoods with a high density of people and destinations, mostly downtown and on the North Lakefront and Near Northwest Side.

Those areas generally got stations every eighth of a mile or better, while less dense parts of town, such as communities on the South and West Sides, usually got half-mile spacing, which means a longer walk to and from stations and destinations. As the system expanded to more outlying neighborhoods in subsequent years, this less-convenient half-mile spacing became the norm. Lower station density has been a factor in less Divvy use in these newer service areas.

2016 ExpansionMap_EvOP_160526_v3
While downtown and the North Lakefront generally have 1/8-mile station spacing or better, most other parts of the city have 1/4-mile spacing. Click to enlarge.

Fortunately, at today’s Mayor’s Bicycle Advisory Council meeting CDOT deputy commissioner Luann Hamilton announced that the city will be adding 40 more stations and 400 more bikes to the system, and will largely be using the new hardware to increase density in communities with a dearth of Divvy. “Some of our newer areas don’t have quite the density that we have in other places,” Hamilton said. The expansion, which will grow the system to about 620 stations and 6,200 bikes, is being funded by a federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement grant plus Divvy revenue.

Some of the additional hardware will also be used to address the issue of bike and dock availability in high-use areas, such as the Loop, which is often largely devoid of Divvy cycles after the evening rush. “In other parts of the city where Divvy is really popular you have situations where there aren’t any available docks, or you can’t get a bike when you’re looking for one,” Hamilton said. “So at some locations we’re going to be adding plates with extra docks.”

The bike-and-dock order is expected to arrive in late summer and the transportation department hopes to install the extra stations by the end of the year. “We’re also going through the federal and state project development process, so we have to check off all the boxes before we get approval to go ahead with all the installations,” Hamilton said.

CDOT hasn’t release the new station location map yet. But hopefully special emphasis will be placed on increasing Divvy density and ridership in Chicago’s lower-income neighborhoods and communities of color, which stand to gain the most from the mobility, health, and economic benefits of cycling. The city has previous addressed this issue through the Divvy for Everyone (D4E) equity problem, which offers $5 annual memberships to Chicagoans making less than $35,310 a year. At the MBAC meeting the city announced a new D4E outreach program featuring ambassadors for the program who are Divvy employees.


  • One huge glaring exception to the “more Divvys in denser northside neighborhoods” is north Sheridan Road in particular in north Edgewater in general. In what should be a prime heavy usage area instead there is Divvy desert. Half mile spacing in an area where up to 60 percent of the residents are carless? It’s nuts.

    It is Alderman Osterman’s fear of Sheridan Road highrise NIMBYs that is partly to blame. It is also the extreme car usage as the automobile gateway to and from Lake Shore Drive and their terrible impact on walking and biking and the concomitant caused lack of good biking infrastructure as another.

    To the common refrain of “we’re not Amsterdam” I heard a few days ago I replied that Amsterdam in the 1970s was just like Edgewater with cars everywhere jamming the streets. As the internet meme points out even “Amsterdam wasn’t Amsterdam”.

  • Courtney

    I lived in Edgewater for almost 3 years. Sheridan Rd. Divvy stations would make SOME sense to ride to and from the lakefront path but as Sheridan Rd. is now I wouldn’t ride on it. Kenmore and Winthrop are better options and you can find a decent amount of stations on N Broadway and N Clark St.

    Getting rid of parking on N Sheridan between Loyola and Howard would do wonders for biking and speeding up bus service on the 147.

  • planetshwoop

    Living just outside of the service area now, I am super hopeful that the expansion will continue along existing lines.

    The downside of an expansion — for me personally — is that I will likely use the bus less if I can use Divvy instead.

  • Trading parking for bus and bike use gets my vote any day.

  • For Sheridan road Divvy should be a good way to Andersonville.

  • Anne A

    My most frequent usage has usually been downtown, though that’s been more challenging due to availability problems – no open docks in the morning, no bikes after work. I’ve noticed that Divvy has really been hustling to keep bikes available at downtown stations. Expansion of some stations is welcome news.


Correcting Konkol: South and West Sides Received the Bulk of New Bike Lanes

Just because you’ve won a Pulitzer Prize doesn’t mean you always get your story straight. DNAinfo’s Mark Konkol posted a column today arguing that Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s bike initiatives are a frivolous distraction from the city’s pressing crime, education, and budget issues. He also claims that Emanuel’s administration hasn’t been giving low-income communities their fair share of […]