Ald. Reilly Has a Responsible Approach to Off-Street Parking

Rendering of new building (right) in West Loop
The proposed building is on the right. The building on the left, K2 Apartments, has 30 percent less parking than the city’s standard 1:1 ratio, but only about half of those spaces are used. Rendering: Pappageorge Haymes

When it comes to parking management in Chicago, there have been a couple of encouraging developments recently. In September, City Council passed a beefed-up revision of the transit-oriented development ordinance, which makes it easier than ever to build dense, parking-lite developments near train stations. And, recently, Ald. Brendan Reilly (42nd) made some very sensible statements about the fact that downtown buildings shouldn’t have tons of car spaces.

It’s not as if Reilly is particularly progressive when it comes to transportation and public space issues. While he has supported some bike infrastructure in his downtown district, he recently tried to pass an ordinance forcing the Chicago Department of Transportation to remove the Kinzie protected lanes.

He blocked CDOT from installing Divvy stations on the Magnificent Mile, and he was was the driving force behind a new law that severely restricts the use of pedicabs in the central business district. And, last week, he lobbied to ban food carts from portions of dozens of streets in his ward, even though the carts offer consumers affordable food choices and add vitality to the public way.

But Reilly might be one of the most forward-thinking City Council members when it comes to promoting residential buildings without an excessive amount of car parking. He has encouraged developers to only build the number of spaces that is appropriate for the location of the project as well as the expected car-ownership rate of the residents. He has noted that buildings with many floors of garage parking make streets less attractive, and most downtown renters don’t own cars.

For example, Cardiff Mason Development is currently pitching a 38-story residential building at 352 North Union Ave. in River West, near the Jewel-Osco at Kinzie and Desplaines. It would have 373 apartments and 158 tenant car parking spaces, for a ratio of 0.42 spaces per unit. However, DNAinfo reported, the developer originally proposed a “substantially higher” number of off-street spots but lowered the number after a meeting with Reilly.

“Some of the neighboring aldermen actually try to pack in as much parking into these structures as they can, but what I evangelize on in our ward is if you build it, they will come,” Reilly told residents at a community meeting on the project on Tuesday, according to DNA. He was apparently referring to the fact that excess parking encourages more residents to bring cars to the neighborhood, which makes congestion worse. “If you’re this close to central business district with lots of modes to get you there, you shouldn’t have a lot of parking,” he added.

Reilly noted that there’s already plenty of public parking near the proposed development site. Indeed, each of the neighboring buildings have giant, publicly accessible parking garages.

And much of that existing parking is unused. The K2 apartment tower, located next door to the planned building site, has 496 residences and a 0.70 parking space-to-unit ratio. Even though that’s 30 percent lower than the city’s usual 1:1 parking requirement, half those spaces sit empty, according to Brian Kidd, an architect with the firm that designed that building, as well as the proposed one.

Last month, Reilly’s newsletter included similar comments about a planned residential high-rise in Streeterville. It said he also requested a reduction of parking spaces for that project “not only to press down on large, multi-story parking bases, but also for practical reasons – the profile of renters downtown does not generally include car ownership.”

Reilly’s not pushing for fewer parking spaces in downtown developments because he’s a wild-eyed, anti-car crusader. Rather, building parking-lite housing in congested, transit-accessible locations is only common sense.

donate button
Did you appreciate this post? Streetsblog Chicago is currently funded until April 2016. Consider making a donation through our PublicGood site to help ensure we can continue to publish next year. Why PublicGood? They’re based in Chicago, and give you an option to pay for your own credit card processing fees. 

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    That’s great, but what’s he doing then to help people get to their destinations easier by transit?

  • Brian

    Will Streetsblog Chicago have 501c3 status anytime soon?

  • We’ve had it since April! Our nonprofit is called the Chicagoland Streets Project. Let me know if you need more info. Thanks!

  • Brian

    Does the DONATE button go to that organization, because its not clear that donations are tax deductible.

  • Yes, we accept donations for the CSP via Public Good, and they are tax deductible. I’ll look into making that more clear on the PG website. Thanks!

  • That’s unclear. I don’t believe he’s blocked any kind of transit expansion (he could have put the brakes on the Loop Link BRT), and he might have been helpful in facilitating the conversation between businesses along the Loop Link BRT and CDOT/CTA.

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    Not blocking isn’t actually doing anything.

  • I realize that, but it’s a function that’s in the middle, between “blocking” and “out there talking to people about it, and moving hills or mountains to keep other forces from blocking it”.

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    Except that the guy basically allows dense development without actually finding a way to support it. He’s the guy helping to create the problem, and not helping to solve it.

  • Is transit service in his ward insufficient to carry on the new riders from the new developments?

  • rohmen

    Considering that many of the people who live in the 42nd Ward likely live within a mile or so of where they work in the loop, I’d say that’s one of the few areas of the City where density can be added without having an increased transit plan already in place. I’d buy the argument to a degree that in-filing without increasing transit can be harmful in places like East Lakeview and Logan Square, but the 42nd Ward largely doesn’t present the same concerns.

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    Except of course much of the development in Streeterville is commercial, with workers and huge numbers of hospital patients, many of whom arrive by car. It isn’t just residential.

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    Once the new RIC building is done, and the two new Northwestern buildings are operational, the area will be impassable during peak hours; I am not even addressing the residential towers.

  • Have you heard about the River North-Streeterville transit study? It’s a testament to this problem. I haven’t been following it closely enough to know if it’s finished or what it recommends.

  • Leggy Mountbatten

    You’re forgetting that much of the development in the area isn’t just residential; there’s a reason Northwestern built a 1,2000 space garage on Ohio, and it isn’t for people who live in the area.


Zoning Committee Passes Watered Down TOD Ordinance

Last Wednesday, the City Council zoning committee passed Mayor Emanuel’s proposed ordinance allowing more walkable, less car-oriented development near train stations. But before the vote, the legislation was watered down with an amendment that makes it harder to construct buildings with lower volumes of car parking. Under the amendment [PDF], commercial developments that include less […]

Parking Craters Aren’t Just Ugly, They’re a Cancer on Your City’s Downtown

Streetsblog’s Parking Madness competition has highlighted the blight that results when large surface parking lots take over a city’s downtown. Even though Rochester, winner of 2014’s Golden Crater, certainly gains bragging rights, all of the competitors have something to worry about: Cumulatively, the past 50 years of building parking have had a debilitating effect on […]