2-to-5-Lane Conversion “Road Binge” Planned for Franklin Park

The planned cross-section of Franklin Avenue.
The planned cross-section of Franklin Avenue.

All over the country, municipalities are reaping the safety and livability benefits of “road diets,” reducing the number of travel lanes on overly wide streets to discourage speeding and make room for bike lanes and wider sidewalks. A common tactic is the “4-to-3 conversion,” in which a four-lane road is converted to two travel lanes plus a turn lane, which studies show doesn’t cause undue congestion on streets that average 20,000 daily trips or fewer. The remix of Lawrence Avenue in Ravenswood and Lincoln Square a few years ago was a good example of this strategy.

However, northwest-suburban Franklin Park, a village of about 18,000 people located directly south of O’Hare Airport, is taking the opposite approach by implementing a “road binge.” They’re planning to balloon a 1.8-mile stretch of Franklin Avenue, from Runge street to east of Mannheim Road, from the current two lanes to five. This stretch of Franklin is located just south of Illinois Route 19, aka Irving Park Road, the four-lane divided highway that wraps around the southern border of the airport.

The project area.
The project area.

“The safety of our residents and connectivity within our community are top priorities for the village,” said Franklin Park mayor Barrett Pedersen in a statement. He added that the project will “[allow] traffic to flow more smoothly.” In reality, more than doubling the capacity of the road will induce more driving and facilitate speeding. The project, which will cost $30 million in taxpayer money, mostly federal funds, is slated for construction between 2021 and 2023.

Granted, Franklin Avenue runs past an industrial area with higher-than-average truck traffic, about 20 percent of existing traffic. The project will create a new connection from I-294, the existing Interstate on the east side of O’Hare, with I-490, the new one being built on the west side of the airport. The mayor argues that, thanks to the Frank Avenue widening, “our community will enjoy new regional connectivity.”

A typical stretch of Franklin Avenue as it appears now. Image: Google Maps
A typical stretch of Franklin Avenue as it appears now. Image: Google Maps

The project includes new and updated traffic signals at several intersection, and improved street lighting throughout the corridor. Franklin Park officials also tout the road expansion as a win for pedestrians and cyclists because it will include a mixed-use side path in a location that currently has no sidewalks. However, it’s not clear that many people will want to bike along a five-lane road, on a stretch that doesn’t connect with any existing bikeways.

All parts of the project area currently average fewer than 14,000 trips per day (fewer than 8,000 at the eastern end), so the two-lane road is the appropriate size for the amount of traffic it currently carries. It’s true that the impending expansion of O’Hare may generate additional traffic, so perhaps adding a turn lane might be warranted in the future.

Current and project ADT.
Current and projected ADT.

But officials are justifying the expansion to five lanes with projections that traffic on this stretch will increase by 36-58 percent by 2050. That’s a self-fulfilling prophesy. If Franklin Avenue is widened by 250 percent, the greatly increased capacity will encourage a heck of a lot more people to drive on it, a phenomenon called induced demand. If you build it, they will come.

But it appears that Mayor Pedersen and other Franklin Park decision-makers are proud that they’re going to enable a lot more motorists to drive a lot faster through their town.

  • ardecila

    I don’t get the criticism. Franklin Park is open about the fact that this is about increasing access, not about addressing existing traffic. They are using this investment to attract bigger industrial firms that will provide more jobs and tax revenue. In the shadow of the world’s busiest airport, I’m sure that if Franklin Park builds it, they really will come.

    Also, from a regional standpoint it’s nice to see inner suburbs working to attract industrial jobs vs exurbs like Bolingbrook or Elwood. Franklin Park is (relatively) well-served by Metra and Pace.

  • planetshwoop

    Yes, if you build it, they will come. That is always the issue with adding roads is the induced demand never really solves the problem.

    Maybe it’s an econ development ploy but it feels more like a solution in search of a problem.

  • Austin Busch

    Interesting, the EOWA factsheet from 2016 said that project would:

    Decrease traffic on local roads by more than 16 percent during rush hour and reduce delays on local roads by 24 percent.

  • David P.

    John, would you please either make relevant images openable (e.g. the ‘Project Area’ visual) or link to the planning document? It’s helpful to learning more about the project in question.

  • Tooscrapps

    It pretty clear Franklin Parks focus is on industry/commercial rather than livability. It’s gotta go somewhere though.

    It’s too bad because Franklin Park’s proximity to the City & jobs, and the great Metra connections could make it a very attractive place to live.

  • Combin8tion

    But this is the anti-car, anti-big road crowd. Of course they will be offended if a municipal body decides to improve roads to facilitate combustion engine driven vehicles – in this case, primarily the truck traffic that will grow when the ramps are built to Franklin Ave. And of course we don’t know what industrial development plans might be on the horizon for this area – something the planning department in Franklin Park might be privy to.

  • Tooscrapps

    Maybe so. But maybe municipalities shouldn’t always put the cart before the horse. Foxconn is a great example of committing to build out the infrastructure for something that might never materialize. This plan hinges on a few other projects coming to fruition, while it itself also is a few years away .

    The Trib mentions that Canadian Pacific wants to increase capacity at their terminal, which will increase truck traffic. Does Franklin Park benefit from accommodating this expansion other than purely mitigating that traffic?

    Because Franklin Park is spending only $1.6MM of the $32MM it’s fair everyone to scrutinize such a project when infrastructure funds are increasingly hard to come by.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Let me look into that.

  • David P.

    Thanks. For instance, the images in this article are legible on my iPad, but it’s impossible to read the details on a desktop. And a link to some kind of source document can help readers learn more on their own.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Garrido Grandstands Against Milwaukee Road Diet at Public Meeting

|
Last night, announced aldermanic candidate John Garrido hijacked a crowded community meeting about the city’s proposal for a safety overhaul of Milwaukee from Lawrence to Elston. He interrupted the event to present Chicago Department of Transportation engineers with what he said were 4,000 signatures in opposition to any reconfiguration of the street that would involve […]

Road Diet Curbs Lawrence Avenue’s Dangerous Mile

|
The one mile of Lawrence Avenue between Ashland and Western avenues, through the Ravenswood neighborhood, went on a road diet this year. The diet slimmed Lawrence from four to two travel lanes, and used the extra space to create room for bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and extensive landscaping. The streetscape project right-sized this stretch of […]