Ignore Those New Signs — It’s Legal to Bike on the Riverwalk

The city pitched the riverwalk as a bikeway, but now it's telling us not to bike on it

Photo: Michelle Stenzel
Photo: Michelle Stenzel

New signs on the Chicago Riverwalk extension say “Share the Riverwalk: Walk your bike,” but you can disregard them.

Or, at least, you would be within your rights to ignore them and keep riding your bike, although other riverwalk users and police may believe that’s not the case, thanks to these misleading signs. (In fairness, the signs are nicely designed and feature a cool fixed-gear cycle.)

Granted, many sections of the riverwalk between State and Lake aren’t great places to ride a bike, given the sharp angles of the path’s turns as it goes around bridge houses, and the crowding that’s common in nice weather after work. And I’m certainly not suggesting you act like a total jerk and recklessly barrel through masses of people strolling, sunning themselves, and sipping wine.

No, you are not being a path hog if you bike on the riverwalk. Photo: John Greenfield
No, you are not being a path hog if you bike on the riverwalk. Photo: John Greenfield

But even when the Riverwalk is packed, I’m usually able to roll through it at roughly walking speed without endangering or upsetting anyone. If necessary, I’ll Fred-Flintstone it or dismount. In fact, a person on a bike takes up less room than a person walking their cycle. If you’re uncomfortable with slow riding then, sure, you may prefer to immediately dismount when you enter a congested section of the path.

However, the signs suggest that it’s illegal to bike on the riverwalk. Even though that’s not the case, it’s possible that could result in some erroneous tickets from police who aren’t familiar with the rules. At the very least, the placards imply that you’re being selfish and not sharing the facility if you don’t dismount, even when the path isn’t crowded, which is an invitation for pedestrians to scold cyclists who are doing nothing wrong.

Moreover, the signs are hypocritical because when Chicago pitched the riverwalk project to the federal government to get an interest-free $99 million transportation loan, they described it as an enhancement for people on foot and bikes. The Riverwalk’s U.S. Department of Transportation’s webpage notes that it was supposed to “include… bicycle facilities” and that “the project [would] enhance safety for pedestrians with bicycle paths and pedestrian trails along the continuous promenade.” In other words, it’s conceivable that if the riverwalk wasn’t sold to the feds as something people could ride bikes on for transportation purposes, Chicago would have never gotten the money to build it.

It’s also worth noting that the entire riverwalk is marked on the city’s Chicago Bike Map as an off-street trail, i.e., something you’re allowed to bike on.

The entire riverwalk is designated as an off-street trail on the city's bike map.
The entire riverwalk is designated as an off-street trail on the city’s bike map.

The Chicago Department of Transportation, which oversaw the construction of the riverwalk and created the bike map, has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Active Transportation Alliance director Ron Burke agrees that the new signs are wrongheaded. “We opposed [“Walk your bike”] signs from the beginning and still do,” he said. “We recommended a ‘Walk your bike when crowded’ policy instead.”

Sustainable transportation advocate Michelle Stenzel, who took the photo at the top of this post, proposed in a tweet another way to largely eliminate bike-ped conflicts on the riverwalk. “If there were a protected bike lane on Upper Wacker, bicyclists wouldn’t have to mix with pedestrians at all.” Indeed, a lane or two of the six lane road, which sits right above the riverwalk, could easily be converted without causing undue traffic congestion.

Screen Shot 2018-09-04 at 5.21.35 PM
Upper Wacker has plenty of room for protected bike lanes. Image: Google Street View

Burke says he’s in favor of looking into that idea. “We know [riverwalk] congestion has become a real issue and are eager to explore other options, including reallocating space on Upper Wacker.”

In the meantime, feel free to bike – at a safe speed, of course – on all parts of the riverwalk, with no apologies.

  • berkeleygirl

    I began to avoid the Riverwalk – walking along which, on my lunch hour, was the highlight of my work day – when it became overrun, not with cyclists, but those bicycle-powered wagons. Those have no place on the paths – too wide, and many who use them don’t know how to maneuver them.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Are you talking about pedicabs, or tourists in rented quad cycles?

  • planetshwoop

    It isn’t just that Wacker is a massive traffic sewer, an alternative exists directly underneath Upper Wacker. Having a bike lane would be delightful. Do we really need a six lane highway on the river?

  • Sam

    What moron wrote this article? Nothing about the sign implies that it’s illegal to walk your bike. Have you ever seen a sign about something being illegal? Because it always mentions it’s illegal or impress some sort of violation by using words like”no” or “do not”.

    What a dumb, pointless article.

  • Sam

    *ride your bike, not walk your bike.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Why Rolling on the River Is No Easy Task

|
[This piece also ran in Checkerboard City, John’s transportation column in Newcity magazine, which hits the streets on Wednesday evenings.] Earlier this month, the Bloomingdale Trail, aka The 606, grabbed the spotlight as our city’s latest fabulous public space. However, the Chicago Riverwalk extension, which partially opened on May 23, is another strong contender. The […]

Take a Virtual Bike Ride on the Riverwalk From Lake Street to the Lake

|
The Chicago Riverwalk extension might not have gotten built if it didn’t function as a car-free transportation corridor as well as a space for recreation. The project was funded through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Transportation Infrastructure Finance Innovation Act program, which provided a $98 million loan. The project also received $10 million in state […]