Skip to content
Sponsored

Today's stories are presented by

What’s the Rationale Behind the Concrete Protection at Randolph/Dearborn?

Dearborn and Randolph intersection has admirers all over the country.
What’s the Rationale Behind the Concrete Protection at Randolph/Dearborn?
Looking south at Randolph/Dearborn in mid-October, prior to the installation of green paint. Photo: John Greenfield[
https://twitter.com/transitized/status/804089935112368128

And even the Green Lane Project, the nation’s leading cheerleader for protected bike lanes, was curious why the concrete islands were placed at the northwest corner, rather than the southwest. That’s the main location where there there’s a potential for conflicts between bikes and motor vehicle, since drivers have to cross the bike lane to make a left turn.

I responded that there are dedicated signal phase for northbound bike riders and turning drivers, so the Chicago Department of Transportation may have felt that further protection wasn’t necessary. In addition, I noted, there used to be an issue with pedestrians at the northwest corner standing in the Dearborn lane while waiting for a walk signal, so the pedestrian islands provide a safe place to stand.

I checked in with Mike Amsden, who manages CDOT’s bikeway program, to get the skinny on why islands were installed at the northwest corner but not the southwest corner. “The intersection concept is provided at this location to mostly assist with people riding west on Randolph who want to turn south on Dearborn,” he responded via email. “The corner refuge island provides a protected space for a person to queue on Dearborn facing south, outside of the path of people continuing west on Randolph. The pedestrian refuge islands also provide space for pedestrians to queue outside of the bike lane, and in a place much more visible to motorists.”

Amsden added that the same treatment wouldn’t work at the southwest corner because there is no “dead space” outside of a travel lane, turn lane, or the two-way bike lane where the concrete could be installed. “If the corner refuge island was shifted straight south to the southwest corner it would be directly in line with left turning motor vehicle traffic from northbound Dearborn to westbound Randolph, and directly in line with westbound traffic on Randolph in the southern most curb lane.”

“Your response… re: the left hook is spot on,” Amsden said. “The signal separation for through bike and turning car traffic provides the protection.” He acknowledged that drivers do occasionally disregard their signal. “But we know from experience in Chicago and elsewhere that the dedicated signals increase compliance for both people riding and people turning left — over 90% compliance for both (not perfect for either, but huge improvements).”

This morning one more reason for installing concrete protection at the northwest corner occurred to me. There were at least three incidents in recent years in which speeding drivers crashed into Petterino’s restaurant, located at that corner. That hasn’t happened since the Dearborn lane was installed, but you can never be too careful.

Photo of John Greenfield
In addition to editing Streetsblog Chicago, John has written about transportation and more for many other local and national publications. A Chicagoan since 1989, he enjoys exploring the city and region on foot, bike, bus, and train.

Read More:

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.