WBEZ Reports CTA/CDOT Have Chosen Center-Running BRT on Ashland


View Larger Map

The proposed 4.5-mile BRT route along Ashland Avenue, according to the WBEZ report.

Bus riders woke up to good news this morning. Citing anonymous sources, WBEZ reports that CTA and Chicago Department of Transportation officials have chosen the “preferred alternative” from the four proposed bus rapid transit configurations, and it’s the one advocates were hoping for. The agencies aren’t ready to go public with their choice yet but, assuming the radio story is accurate, the decision to go with center-running buses with parking and medians retained could lead to much faster bus service and a safer, more pleasant walking environment.

For starters, CTA and CDOT will be pushing to build BRT on a 4.5-mile stretch of Ashland Avenue between Archer and Milwaukee avenues, the locations of the Ashland Orange Line and Division Blue Line stops, respectively, WBEZ reports. The agencies were considering building routes for most of the lengths of both Ashland and Western avenues, so it’s slightly disappointing that the project is starting small. But a successful pilot on this relatively short stretch will make it easier to expand the route in the future and build BRT on other streets as well.

If they had to pick a single 4.5-mile stretch anywhere in Chicago, this part of Ashland is an excellent choice. It runs through the heart of the city and areas with high traffic congestion, where dedicated bus lanes can do the most good. And in addition to linking ‘L’ stations along the Orange, Pink, Green and Blue lines, this route will serve the Illinois Medical District, which has several hospitals. These are important destinations for low-income residents, seniors and people with disabilities, groups that disproportionately rely on buses to get around.

According to the radio piece, the proposal still needs to be vetted by Mayor’s Emanuel’s office, which might object to the removal of travel lanes and left turns on Ashland to make way for the dedicated bus lanes. Since Rahm is an outspoken BRT advocate, that seems unlikely. A bigger challenge will be educating business owners and residents about its benefits: much faster bus service for tens of thousands of Chicagoans with minimal impact on car traffic speeds, plus increased economic development along the corridor. We’ll provide more details on the plan and reactions to it in a future post.

Update: According to CTA spokeswoman Lambrini Lukidis, via email, “All potential options for BRT on Western and Ashland avenues are still under review. CTA is on track with its previously announced schedule for choosing a preferred alternative, which is winter 2012/2013.”

  • C L

    Sweet — this looks like a great location for BRT.  We really need faster North/South service in that area.  Cars can still take Western, so I don’t think the loss of car lanes will be a problem.

  •  Yes, this would be a really useful place for BRT.

  • Alan Robinson

    I’ll be interested in how much of a compromise to reliability truncating
    the BRT treatment will be. The Chicago&Milwaukee blue line stop is
    a strong anchor for a northern terminus of the express service on Ashland, but there is continuing strong demand on the route south of the Orange line stop that could still affect the reliability of the express service, especially during the northbound morning peak.

    Attached is a plot of the ridership on the route from Sept 2010 data. I’ve also included ridership on the 22-Clark route north of Belmont in order to asses an extension of the Ashland BRT north of Irving Park.

  • Adam Herstein

    Looks like a good start, but I feel like it should at least go to the Clybourn Metra station.

  • That would be helpful.

  • Adam Herstein

    What is going to happen to the #9 bus after this is implemented? Since the BRT won’t be able to fully replace the old bus line, is the #9 going to be split up into a north and south route, starting at the terminals of the BRT? It doesn’t make sense to overlap the #9 route with BRT.

  • Adam Herstein

    That should at least be in the first extension.

  • Joseph Musco

    Is this 4.5 mile stretch on Ashland the most affluent section of either corridor?

  • In terms of affluence, both Western and Ashland are pretty economically diverse on this stretch. In terms of real estate potential, sure, these are sections that should be valuable because of their proximity to the Loop, but that’s also why they would be the most useful sections for BRT, because they’re central.

  • Anonymous

    On the north end, it doesn’t look to me like the Division Street Blue Line terminal has an elevator for handicap access. Am I wrong, or will this be corrected?

    The Ashland-Orange line is handicap accessible.

  • Correct, but that’s where Ashland crosses the Blue Line. Hopefully the station will be made ADA compliant sooner than later. I suppose that would be an argument for doing BRT on Western, since the Blue Line’s Artimage/Western stop does have an elevator.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Suburbanophile: Renn Praises Chicago Big-Boxes, Pans Ashland BRT

|
Aaron Renn, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and a contributing editor at City Journal, writes the popular blog The Urbanophile, and sometimes his articles are right on the money. For example Streetblog NYC reporter Stephen Miller tells me Renn was justified in complaining about the high cost of New York infrastructure projects in a Daily News op-ed […]

Business Owners Fail to See the Value of BRT

|
The proposal by the CTA and Chicago Department of Transportation to create Bus Rapid Transit corridors along Ashland and Western Avenues promises to speed bus trips for tens of thousands of Chicagoans and spur development. But it’s going to take some work to persuade local merchants that better transit is good for their bottom line. […]