Most Beacon Street Neighbors Agree: 9 Units With 10 Spots Won’t Create a Parking Crunch

While a flier circulated by a neighbor called the development proposed for this parking lot "supersized," half of the building would be only about three feet taller than this four-story building next door, and the other half would be considerably shorter. Photo: John Greenfield
While a flier circulated by a neighbor called the development proposed for this parking lot "supersized," half of the building would be only about three feet taller than this four-story building next door, and the other half would be considerably shorter. Photo: John Greenfield

Disclosure: Co-author John Greenfield lives in Sheridan Park near the site of the proposed building.

It was a packed house last night at the community meeting for the proposed zoning change that would allow for the construction of a nine-unit multifamily building on what’s now a surface parking lot in Uptown’s Sheridan Park enclave, located a seven-minute walk from the Wilson Red and Purple line station. Read our previous coverage to get up to speed on the issue.  

As Streetsblog’s Courtney Cobbs entered the meeting at Longacre restaurant, hosted by the Beacon Block Club, a passerby asked what was going. Informed of the subject matter, she said she feels the current 28-space parking lot, located at the northwest corner of Sunnyside Avenue and Beacon Street, presents a safety issue at night. She added that she’s prefer that housing take the place of the lot in order to have more “eyes on the street.”

Alderman James Cappleman has said he will honor the recommendation of the block club on whether the property should be upzoned from the current RS-3 designation, which allows for a single-family home or two townhouses, to the B2-3 classification, which would allow for denser housing. The BBC has been collecting input on the matter from residents through various channels, including an online survey which ended at 11:59 on Wednesday.

Rendering of the proposed 9-flat.
Rendering of the proposed 9-flat, looking west from Beacon.

The meeting started with the introductions of Beacon Block Club president Dustin Fogle; vice president Stuart Berman, secretary Ben West; Sunnyside Mall rep Ian Mirk-Whiting; and Dover Street Neighbors Association and Courtenay Elementary representative Lindsay Hall. The BBC officers noted that unfortunately, whether they recommend the zoning change or not, not all neighbors are going to be happy with their decision or the process by which they reached it.

Next the zoning lawyer and architect for the developer, Steve Sgouras of Athenas Development, presented the plans and addressed concerns raised at previous neighborhood meetings. A flier recently posted on local buildings by nearby resident John Cusick stated that the proposed building, would be “supersized” compared to nearby buildings. But the lawyer noted that the three-story section of the building that faces Beacon would be only about one foot taller than the next structure to the north, 4506 North Beacon. And the four-story portion of the new building, including a penthouse, would be roughly three feet taller than the apartment building directly to the west.  

The architect explained that, because the property lies outside the quarter-mile transit-oriented development zone around the the Wilson station, the city is requiring a 1:1 parking-to-units ratio for the nine three-bedroom units, and the developer is opting to add a tenth handicap-accessible car spot. While the existing surface lot is entered through the alley, the architect said the current plan calls for a new curb cut on Sunnyside for the garage driveway, which would eliminate one curbside parking spaces. (Cusick’s flier said it would eliminate two on-street spots.)

Residents had previously asked if the garage access could be moved to the alley to prevent drivers from crossing the sidewalk and the loss of on-street parking. The architect said alley access would require the loss of two of the garage spots, which would bring the number of spaces to eight, below the nine required by the zoning code.

One potential solution to avoid the pedestrian hazard posed by the next driveway, and the loss of the curbside spot, would be to require Sgouras to get rid of the penthouse. With only eight units, the garage entrance could be moved to the back without breaking the city’s 1:1 parking ratio rule.

Scan (1)
John Cusick’s flier, featuring several inaccurate or misleading statements about the project.

After that, the floor was opened to questions and comments from attendees. One resident argued that the neighborhood is being “condo-ized,” and said she’s worried that too many condominiums could lead to higher property values and therefore housing costs, which could price her out of her studio apartment, a valid concern. On the other hand, another neighbor recently told Streetsblog that there have been some condo-to-apartment conversions in the neighborhood recently, so he feels that adding more homeowners would help balance that out.

Another attendee questioned the input process for the zoning decision. The BBC leaders responded that they’ve taken a “three-pronged” approach, including fielding 25-30 comments via email and discussions at community meetings, in addition to the online survey. They said around 230 people have voted in the survey so far, “a tremendous” rate of participation, although they will be double checking IP addresses and home addresses to make sure all votes are valid.

One longtime resident said she felt the design of the building fit reasonably well with surrounding buildings, but she was opposed to the additional density and the loss of the on-street parking spot, and noted that the new curb cut would be a hazard for pedestrians.

On the other hand, another neighbor said, “I know this is sort of an unpopular question, but is it possible to not have any parking [at the new building]?” The zoning lawyer responded that he doesn’t believe that’s possible under the current TOD rules, and at most a zoning variance could potentially cut the requirement by 20 percent to seven spaces.

One thing that seemed to come out of the meeting was a consensus that, given that current plans call for the for 1.11 spot per household, the claim on Cusick’s flier that the project would result in “nine new homeowners looking for parking” is untrue. Even the mainstream news website Block Club Chicago reported, “that notion was generally squashed on Tuesday evening. The development will be providing ten parking spaces at the nine-unit building, so residents would not need to street park, as the fliers warned.”

But as a subsequent discussion on the Beacon Block Club Facebook discussion page revealed, a few residents still aren’t convinced. In fairness to these parking pessimists, Cusick’s dire prediction of nine new homeowners needing on-street parking could come actually true — if a full eight of the nine households bring two cars each to the neighborhood, and the ninth household brings three cars.

  • ardecila

    It’s unfortunate that the Ashland bus stops at Irving Park, otherwise this site would be in the TOD zone around that bus route.

    Honestly this development does a nice job concealing the parking from Beacon. The Sunnyside elevation posted on Cappleman’s website shows an arched entrance, real stone details and some other nice features as well. If it’s only serving 8 cars, I don’t have an issue with granting the curb cut… 99.5% of the time it won’t affect the pedestrian experience.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Thanks, I hadn’t noticed that rendering, available here. https://www.james46.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/4502-N-BEACON-2-4-19_small.pdfhttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/94f2e9287ac6673f3b6289a44d83507ece889c9b9ebe4d093858992153c7617b.png

    If the garage only had eight spots, the entrance could be placed in the alley, which would eliminate the risk of sidewalk crashes and preserve the curbside parking spot that would otherwise be eliminated.

  • johnaustingreenfield
  • Dustin Clark

    Zoning variance to the rescue! Keep the penthouse condo, lose the curb cut and 2 parking spots. 8 parking spots for 9 units is plenty.

    Also, I feel the need to say the historic character of the neighborhood is a mute point–we are talking about an existing parking lot!!! The articulation of the building is fine, and nothing kills dense urban fabric + character like street-side surface parking lots.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    “8 parking spots for 9 units is plenty.” Agreed. Heck, this development would probably work fine with zero garage spots, perhaps combined with implementing permit parking that’s not available to the new residents. But otherwise it’s pretty clear that the neighbors would throw a fit about anything less than a 1:1 parking ratio.

  • Tooscrapps

    Just outside of the 1/4 mile TOD zone sadly. It’s sucks that Sunnyside isn’t considered P-street for those 2 blocks (due to the designation’s commercial aspect), but as was mentioned, is a enjoyable walk to the Wilson stop. I can’t imagine a better location for a parking variance given those factors.

    Also, kudos for whoever pushed the development team on that issue. They didn’t seem too keen to note that they had the ability to ask for less parking earlier. How about this: up-zone for the project in exchange for less spots and alley access. Seems like a fair trade to me.

  • Jamie Martin

    I’m not sure what meeting you covered, but as someone who was in the middle of the conversation I didn’t hear the consensus about parking you mention. The concern about parking was not addressed beyond an implicit “deal with it.” And to suggest that everyone is being overly pessimistic suggests a naivete or a willful refusal to acknowledge a potential issue. All the nine units in the proposed development are three-bedroom capable. While some units will only have two formal bedrooms, the developer’s attorney acknowledged that even those will have a den or study room that could theoretically be used as bedrooms. As I walk around the neighborhood, it seems like most households have two cars. It’s not unreasonable to assume the same rule of thumb will apply to the proposed development.

  • what_eva

    The problem with this idea is that often in a smaller condo building, parking spots belong to the unit, usually as a limited common element (which is how porches are classified). Which means that the developer sells spots with the units and therefore one unit wouldn’t have a spot. That becomes a less desirable unit even to someone without a car because when they go to sell they’ve limited the buyer pool.

    In a larger building with limited spots, it would make sense to just rent spots out to whoever needs them, but that’s a lot of overhead for a small building.

  • Viejo
  • johnaustingreenfield

    Yes, obviously Sheridan Park is a BS neighborhood name, concocted by real estate developers… in 1894.
    http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/1293.html

  • Viejo

    Other academic accounts note that the area was never known as Sheridan Park, but was always thought of as a section of the Uptown Neighborhood, until local boosters engineered a re-branding:

    “People who had lived there for fifty years never knew the area as “Sheridan Park.” To them it was“Heart of Uptown” or simply Uptown. The new name of the community was a critical step in its reinvention as a real estate development. To well-off Chicagoans the name Uptown epitomized burnt-out buildings, street corner bums swigging cheap wine from brown paper bags, and public aid recipients. Bluestone, Tangora, and Lange’s renaming of the community was an overt attempt to appropriate the past in service of a new future. Pushed aside were contemporary notions of Uptown as“Chicago’s most diverse community,” a mix of southern whites, American Indians, Hispanics, and Asians.”

    https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=history_facpubs

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Parking-Lite Residences Sprouting All Across Chicago

|
The resurgent downtown economy and the growing demand for car-lite living, both in Chicago and nationally, have spurred an apartment-building boom that’s transforming neighborhoods citywide. Many of these apartments are rising along the Chicago Transit Authority’s rail lines, partially thanks to a recent change to the city’s zoning ordinance that has made it easier to […]

A Mistake By the Lake? Developer Wants a 250-Car Garage in Rogers Park

|
[This piece also appears in Checkerboard City, John’s weekly transportation column in Newcity magazine, which hits the streets on Wednesday evenings.] Colonel J.N. Pritzker, one of Chicago’s wealthiest, most influential residents, is a historic preservationist and a bicycle advocate. As an heir to the Pritzker family fortune and longtime Rogers Park resident, the billionaire has […]

Now the Jeff Park NIMBYs Are Fighting Arena’s P-Street Proposal

|
The Jefferson Park NIMBYs are at it again. First they went nuclear over the city’s proposal for a road diet with protected bike lanes on Milwaukee Avenue, which would have reduced speeding and crashes, and created more people-friendly retail strips. Now they’re freaking out about 45th Ward Alderman John Arena’s proposed ordinance to designate a […]