Fulton Market Proposal Will Add 1,062 Car Parking Spaces to the Traffic-Choked West Loop

The plan includes way too much parking for this transit-friendly, walkable neighborhood

Map of the Fulton Market area with five proposed buildings outlined. Car-heavy ones are shown in blue; the car-lite one is shown in Green. Image: Google Earth; edited by Steven Vance.
Map of the Fulton Market area with five proposed buildings outlined. Car-heavy ones are shown in blue; the car-lite one is shown in Green. Image: Google Earth; edited by Steven Vance.

Chicago desperately needs a parking maximum policy, which would help make our streets safer, reduce congestion and pollution, promote walkability, and address falling transit ridership. It might seem like a stretch to connect all those dots, but the glut of parking spaces that are currently being built in transit-friendly, walkable neighborhoods are only going to worsen contribute to our city’s traffic jam and pollution problems.

Last month Shaun Jacobsen wrote about the plan to build over a thousnd car spaces next door to the Red Line’s Chicago Avenue station, which has 24-hour service and multiple bus route connections, as part of the Holy Name Cathedral parking lot redevelopment. If that didn’t already make it clear that we need to cap the amount of parking that developers can build, now there’s another example of a “worst practice.”

Sterling Bay, which is responsible for most of the new or rehabbed office space that has been created in the West Loop since the current boom began in 2012, is building 1,062 more car spots in that neighborhood. The spaces will be constructed in conjunction with three new office towers and a retail building with a movie theater in the Fulton Market area.

Those four lots, on Green and Morgan streets between Kinzie Street and Fulton Market, are within walking distance of two ‘L’ stations served by three train lines. The Grand Blue Line station has 24-hour service, and the Green and Pink lines serve the Morgan stop. High-frequency bus routes also run near the parcels on Grand Avenue and Halsted Street.

The Center for Neighborhood Technology ranks these lots a 9.8 out of 10 on their AllTransit Performance Score, which rate the level of transit access a location has for trips to workplaces, schools, and other destinations. This means that tons of people are already taking transit here, and the neighborhood offers lots of jobs that are accessible by trains and buses “enabling [a] significant number of people to take transit to work.” There are 86 bus and ‘L’ stops within half a mile of these four vacant or underused lots.

Walk Score, which focuses on residential and living needs, gives these block a rating of about 96, or “walker’s paradise,” meaning that “daily errands do not require a car.”

Locating an office and other commercial uses on these lots is a very good idea, according to AllTransit. There are potentially 510,616 customers living within a 30 minute transit ride of this location, and potentially 550,179 people who could work in this location and only spend 30 minutes or less on a transit commute here.

Right now there are 6,579 jobs in the same Census block group as the lots, and 100 percent of them have good access to transit. Currently, though, only 16 percent of these employees take transit to work here, but another 25 percent walk.

The construction of a group of offices with 1,062 car parking spaces means that the area will see hundreds more car trips every day. But neighbors argue that congestion is already a major problem in the West Loop during rush hours, with drivers traveling at sub-walking speeds at some locations.

So why build all this new parking? Given the lots’ proximity to the Morgan station, not a single car spot is required.

The good news is that even though Chicago doesn’t a parking maximum policy, the Chicago Plan Commission can still improve this ill-conceived proposal. On Thursday, February 15, the plan commission will hear the three proposals, and the public is allowed to attend. You can also contact 27th Ward alder. Walter Burnett to let him know you’re opposed to bringing hundreds of additional cars to the neighborhood.

A fourth office building has been proposed by Latsko Interests at 375 N Morgan St (marked in green on the map.) It would be a ten-story building with only 49 car parking spaces — much more appropriate for this transit-rich location.

  • F. Hayek 69

    The only people punished by this are other west loop drivers.

  • Eric

    If only. But it just continues the citywide cycle of more parking leading to more driving leading to adding more parking, etc.

    (Paragraph 11 is missing a “have”.)

  • I’m cynically starting to wonder if parking maximums would just increase the number of Ubers and Lyfts on the streets.

  • Obesa Adipose

    The author of this article fails to mention that all these parking spaces are being designed for adaptation to other uses should the parking not be needed.

  • Buddha_Dharma

    My family has lived in this area for 3 generations, own miltiple businesses and buildings and have contributed extensively to this commity for over a 100 years. I’m sick and tired of broke-ass millenials such as this bottom feeding, scum sucking blogger pushing their insane bullshit on the 96% of us that rely on transportation other than bicycles for our commuting and our livelihoods. Hey blogger, take your little bicycle and go back to Podunk where you came from and take your 3rd world poverty-generating ideas with you.

  • 1976boy

    The other possibility is that like in River North, a large percentage of the spaces will go unused, unnecessarily pushing the price of construction up for no good reason. Some developers are just too fearful that they will alienate drivers, who they see as their target demographic, even if it is not true.

  • Random_Jerk

    I think we still haven’t reached ‘critical mass’ of traffic in downtown Chicago area, that will make people rethink driving. As much as I think so much parking is a nonsense, I want West Loop to choke in traffic and gridlock to death. Maybe then developers and city officials realize there is time to focus more on efficient public transportation than cars and parking spaces.

  • Tooscrapps

    Definitely has a ripple effect across the City.

  • Tooscrapps

    Except once we reach that ‘critical mass’ it will be all the harder to re-purpose space away from motor traffic.

    Better to put the facilities in sooner, rather than later.

  • Cameron Puetz

    The issue here is likely suburban commuters. Many of the corporate headquarters relocations from the suburbs have congregated in this area. These sites are a similar distance (1.0-1.3 mi) from Union Station as buildings like the Aon Center (1.3 mi) that have struggled to draw Metra commuters without offering a shuttle service.

  • rohmen

    Flowing off the earlier article on here, this is something where Metra and CTA cooperation could help greatly. If we could work out some sort of minimal transfer fee in spots for CTA and Metra, I’d imagine a lot of commuters would be willing to use the Pink and Green Line trains to get from Clinton to Morgan every day—especially those that come into the Ogilvie station.

  • Anne A

    Sterling Bay – an obscene phrase I always dread in connection with new developments. Them put in a crappy car-centric development adjacent to Beverly which have has negative effects on nearby neighborhoods. They failed to put in even the most basic measures for safe ped and bike access in an area where thousands of people live within easy walking or biking distance. They weren’t willing to add a sidewalk along the edge of their property, put in any bike parking or help with the cost of adding a bike lane on an adjacent street that’s one of the few good rideable streets for crossing Western. I am not a fan of anything they do.


Logan Square Developer Would Rather Choose How Much Parking to Build

A site that’s currently a staging area for Your New Blue ‘L’ station renovation may soon be home to a transit-oriented mixed-use building. Property Markets Group has proposed a new apartment building for Logan Square that will provide half the normally required car parking, bringing needed housing with less congestion. Parking minimums for this and […]