Cyclists Voice Their Hopes, Concerns, and Questions About Dockless Bike-Share

A Jump Mobility dockless cycle on the Lakefront Trail last week. Photo: John Greenfield
A Jump Mobility dockless cycle on the Lakefront Trail last week. Photo: John Greenfield

As the debate rages on about whether dockless bike-share technology would do more good or harm for Chicago, last week city transportation officials asked cyclists what questions they should ask potential vendors at an upcoming info session.

Dockless bike-share, aka DoBi (“Dough Bee”), typically involves cycles with built-in wheel locks that are left “free-locked” around a city for customers to locate and access via a smartphone app, generally for $1 per half hour. Proponents say this represents the future of bike-sharing, which could help bring public bikes to outlying Chicago neighborhoods that probably won’t be getting Divvy stations anytime soon. Others argue that it’s a lower-quality form of bike-share, with artificially low rates propped up by venture capital, that would cause street clutter and cannibalize Divvy ridership.

At last week’s Mayor’s Bicycle Advisory Council meeting, Chicago Department of Transportation deputy commissioner Sean Wiedel, who oversees the Divvy program, said that the city hopes to install 40 new stations this spring, bringing the total to 620, with about 6,200 bikes. Pending final approval from the Illinois Department of Transportation and local aldermen, the new docks will be used to add stations downtown and in underserved communities where low station density currently makes the system less useful. He also gave a shout-out to former Divvy general manager Elliot Greenberger, who is moving to LA to work for Lyft, and has been replaced by Michael Critzon.

Next Wiedel addressed the DoBi issue, reiterating what he said at last month’s Mayor’s Pedestrian Advisory Council meeting, that the city doesn’t yet have a position on the technology. He added that, along with CDOT, the mayor’s office, the law department, and the department of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection will have input on policy decisions. Wiedel said the city plans to invite dockless vendors to present their proposed business models and ideas in the next month or so and use that info to inform future city policy.

Dockless bikes in Washington D.C. Photo: John Greenfield
Dockless bikes in Washington D.C. Photo: John Greenfield

Next, rather than answer questions about DoBi from MBAC attendees, Wiedel and CDOT’s Divvy program manager Amanda Woodall asked those present to recommend questions that the city should ask the companies, which Woodall wrote down on a large piece of paper.

One person wondered what the rules would be about the city seizing bikes parked in locations where they pose a hazard, or broken cycles. According to Tom Fucoloro from Seattle Bike Blog, when DoBi cycles are left lying on sidewalks or blocking crosswalks in Seattle, which has several thousand of dockless bikes, they’re usually moved promptly by passers-by.

Oboi Reed, leader of the new mobility justice organization Equiticity, which is establishing bike libraries on the South and West Sides with cycles provided by DoBi companies, implied that Chicago should allow the technology to come to town as soon as possible. “The question I would ask is how soon are y’all able to bring bikes to our city to address the unmet need for Black and Brown people to have bikes in their neighborhoods, given the public resource nature of bike-share in our city and the potential for increased bike mode share in our neighborhoods to improve health, create jobs, and reduce violence, which research shows happens when bike mode share increases in a neighborhood,” Reed said. “So what I want to know is are y’all able to come tomorrow? Next month? Next year?”

IMG_8108
Amanda Woodall writes down questions for DoBi providers. Photo: John Greenfield

Bike-focused attorney Brendan Kevenides (a Streetsblog sponsor) asked how people without smartphones or credit cards can access DoBi cycles. Some companies provide subsidized rides for low-income people, who can use RIFD cards or pass codes to unlock the bikes.

Longtime bike advocate Kathy Schubert (whose campaign against dangerous metal-grate bridges was the reason the bike-friendly anti-skid plates on the spans are nicknamed “Kathy plates”) asked for a show of hands of how many people “don’t think [dockless] would ever work in Chicago.” About half of the MBAC attendees raised their hands.

Lakeview resident Allan Mellis wanted to know what plans DoBi companies have to bring the technology to underserved neighborhood, rather than simply focusing on profitable high-demand parts of town. He was also curious about what the rules for parking the bikes would be. “That would be up to us to decide,” Wiedel said.

Major Taylor Cycling Club of Chicago president Peter Taylor asked what liability protections there would be for dockless bike-share customers, for example if a cycle that they had checked out and parked properly later fell down and someone tripped over it.

An attendee who had recently experienced DoBi in Shanghai said he found the bikes to be “futuristic and wonderful,” but was curious about enforcement of dockless parking rules. “I use the analogy of pet waste,” he said. “We have rules against it and yet there’s a lot of pet waste on the sidewalk. How do we make sure it’s enforced rather than simply having another rule on the books?”

ll
Kathy Schubert, front left, asked attendees how many of them “don’t think [dockless] would ever work in Chicago.” Photo: John Greenfield
Sharon Feigon, head of the Shared Use Mobility Center, was curious about opportunities to integrate different DoBi services with Divvy and transit, and to get ridership data from the companies.

Technical writer Trina Grieshaber asked whether the dockless bikes would be available in different sizes to accommodate shorter riders. While I’ve seen a 4’10’’ friend ride a Divvy ape hanger-style, the cycles also work (just barely) for rangy Streetsblog writer Steven Vance. In contrast, the DoBi cycles I’ve ridden seem like they might not work well for people much over six feet. Grieshaber also wondered if there are any safeguards to keep DoBi users from bringing the relatively light bikes into their homes and keeping them there until they’re ready to take another ride.

Dan Black from the bike equity group Slow Roll Chicago asked whether dockless providers who operate in neighborhoods without Divvy stations will be required to hire local residents to “rebalance” and maintain the bikes. Spin, one of the DoBi companies that has been courting Chicago, has been in talks with the bike education center West Town Bikes about hiring youth from communities of color to service a future fleet.

Finally someone asked, “To what extent will a new dockless bike-share program compliment or compete with existing bike-share programs?” Wiedel replied. “Well, that’s a perfect question to end our discussion, and it’s one that’s on the top of our minds, absolutely.”

  • kastigar

    I’m not sure what harm can be done by letting all the companies try it.

    The city, of course, needs to publish restrictions on bike parking. It’s a bicycle, it can be ridden anywhere as long as the rules of the road are followed. There are parking restrictions: you can’t park any bike on private property. You can’t park any bike on certain CTA locations. Any bike parked illegally should be towed. Let the owner look for where the towed bikes are stored.

    If it doesn’t work, they will quit.

  • Eric

    For those of us in carcentric neighborhoods, this would be a lot more convenient than Divvy, as the stations are few and far between.

    FWIW, I’ve been a Divvy member since its inception but only used the membership once last billing cycle/ year, mainly due to moving from Ukrainian Village to Avondale and being .5 miles or more from nearest station(s). Now the bus is the better option when not riding your own bike.

  • Eric

    Nothing wrong with trying it out. They just need a friendly, simple rule like “be kind, please rewind”. “Be kind,…don’t park the bike in rude, out of way, stupid area…” But people paid to think of clever slogans can figure that out. :)

  • Carter O’Brien

    Avondale still needs work. I’m lucky that I’m close to the dock station on Belmont/Kimball, but that is also an awful place to be a launching point due to the timing/auto-centrism of the light cycles there.

  • Carter O’Brien

    Makes me wonder how effective that “be kind, please rewind” policy was!

  • ChicagoCyclist

    Hmmm…. Usually governments get the short end of the stick when they “negotiate” with private-sector, for-profit companies. I am wondering what will happen if these private dockless bike share companies go “belly up.” Rebalancing, repairing, enforcing rules, etc. — this ain’t trivial stuff. Bike share is a form of public transportation — if the goal is purely “profit,” then it probably ain’t gonna work.

  • Many of the comments on this topic are of this variety, namely “dockless will be great because then there will be bikes near me in X”. What makes you think the bikes will stay there?

  • Eric

    At least there will be one when I ride home? I live near the Green Exchange so would always park it there. Will it be there next day, etc.? Probably not but one leg of my trip was easier.

  • Eric

    Good question. Might need an established Gen Xer or Boomer to respond to that. I think my family always rewound.

  • Jared Kachelmeyer

    I thought you were fined if you failed to rewind.

  • Carter O’Brien

    They definitely imposed fines, but I think that was still less preferable than having to deal with the problem. It was pretty common to see local video store employee busily rewinding tapes when you were there just browsing, and also to hear other customers curse as they were assessed fees based on (presumably) someone else in their household who had dropped off an un-rewound video.

  • rwy

    Since it’s venture capital money on the line, can’t hurt to give it a try.

  • Eric

    In that case, we would’ve rewound, the ‘rents didn’t mess around with additional costs.

    Maybe the user could be fined for improper parking? Granted that is not *the* solution to bad parking, just a minor deterrent.

  • Michael J. Erickson

    Have no fear, give the proposers a hear…another niche market for cyclists can’t hurt, if it does we try something else; who knows, a little competition for dock-the-bike companies might be a good thing. The only thing that could go wrong is sitting tight and not trying to expand bike ridership by all means available!!! Happy Solstice!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG