Development Near Wilson Stop Goes Parking-Lite for Rentals, Parking-Heavy for Townhomes

A rendering of the proposed development provided by the architect, Zisong Feng.
A rendering of the proposed development provided by the architect, Zisong Feng.

Last Thursday, 46th ward alderman James Cappleman held a community meeting to provide a first look at a planned development proposed for 4608-4618 North Malden, a large empty lot located a five-minute walk west of the Wilson ‘L’ station that has been vacant since 2005. Developer Steve Sgouras’ attorney Andrew Scott presented the plans for eleven 1,800-square-foot, two-to-three-bedroom townhouses and 50 mixed-bedroom apartments on the site, including 47 total parking spaces.

The lot is currently zoned RT-4, which permits “townhomes and low-density, multi-unit residential buildings” according to the city’s zoning code. The developer is seeking a zoning change to RM-4.5, the next step up from the current zoning. The zoning change would permit the developer to build a slightly higher number of dwelling units thanks to a higher floor-area ratio and a small building height increase. Uptown is a neighborhood of varying but generally low building heights; this block and its neighbors have buildings that are mainly three-to-five stories high. By proposing 4.5 stories and a maximum height of 53 feet, the developer and architect are hardly pushing boundaries in terms of height.

The location of the vacant lot. Image Google Maps

Unfortunately the site lies 20 feet outside of the transit-oriented development zone for the Wilson station, so the project is not eligible to have minimum parking requirements waived. However, by building 25 underground parking spaces for the 50 rental units, the developer is providing fewer spots than the 1:1 ratio usually required. Scott noted the trend toward less car use, saying “many people are foregoing spending 400 bucks a month on car payments and insurance. They’d much rather use the ‘L,’ they like to use Uber or Lyft.” He added that the reconstruction of the Wilson stop, which is nearing completion, will make transit an even more appealing option. 

While building less parking and decoupling its cost from renting an apartment are steps in the right direction, unused parking spaces still impact the overall cost of a new development, so getting the number right is important. Scott noted that they “don’t want to saddle anyone with a parking bill if they don’t want it,” but unused parking can still raise your rent. Research shows that an underground parking space in Chicago costs $36,000 to construct, a cost that is passed on to renters if parking spaces go unused. The alderman’s chief of staff Tressa Feher noted that “A lot of the developers in the area who have built 1:1 ratios have half-empty garages.” This information can be used to resist calls from neighbors for more parking spaces.

A concerning aspect of the underground garage is the 23-foot curb cut the developer has proposed for driveway access to the garage. Any driveway creates an additional point of conflict for people walking and bicycling and introduces the possibility of sidewalk blockage. In addition, the developer plans to  build a short ramp from the below-grade parking garage to street level, which would potentially create sight line and safety issues. Eliminating the need for a curb cut by moving garage access to the alley could improve safety. 

Neighbors at the meeting were also displeased that the Malden curb cut would remove two free parking spaces from Malden. The block is zoned for permit-only parking.

Ground floor plan, showing the curb cut on Malden.
Ground floor plan, showing the curb cut on Malden.

While the amount of parking planned for the development’s rental units is less than usually required, the parking accommodation for the townhouses, which would be located at the rear of the property, is greater than required. The city requires one space per unit at the current and proposed zoning, but each townhome includes a two-car garage with alley access. Despite having previously stated enthusiasm regarding fewer parking spaces for the rental units, Scott said the townhome parking is “maybe a little bit more than actually needed, but from some perspectives, better more than less.” Indeed, it is likely more than actually needed; in the census tract encompassing the proposed development, only 14% of households own two cars.

I asked Scott if the garage space could be converted to livable space should the townhome owner preferred this to space for warehousing automobiles. However, unlike livable space, parking is not calculated in a development’s floor area ratio, which means the garages currently unconvertible. This is an important consideration for new developments, which generally have more parking than pre-war buildings we continue to inhabit, as we work toward a future with fewer cars and increased transportation options.

Overall, the proposed development will bring new housing to a long-vacant lot without adding an excessive number of car spaces, so it represents a step in the right direction. As other developments in the city have proven, however, we can always push the envelope and go lower than a 50 percent parking ratio, even as far as zero spaces for a residential building. Hopefully, the amount of parking included in the design will not be increases after feedback from meeting attendees as it moves into the planned development process. The development is currently in preliminary stages and will next move to the alderman’s zoning & development committee for approval.

  • rohmen

    We have always been a one-car family (and try to be car-light at that), but when we considered buying a townhouse in the city, we generally looked only at places with a two car garage. We intended to use the extra space for storage (since many townhomes lack storage space), and our realtor at the time noted that’s a pretty common situation. I think that factors into the developer’s minds as well in terms of units for purchase.

  • Frank Kotter

    Agree about the curb cut. Although, I think the best way to make such a development work is to indeed remove the two spots and replace that with a peninsula to service the ever increasing pick up-drop off care use.

    Sink that underground parking entrance in the alley. Absolutely.

  • Kurtis P

    Yeah, I think this development is generally good. If they could find a way to move the garage access to the alley, that would be ideal. They could probably get away with half the townhomes not having 2 car garages. Or better yet, make them all “garage plus”. As another commenter notes, purchasers want 2 car garages for extra storage. So instead of making them wide enough for two cars, make the large enough for 1 plus storage space.

  • They need to redesign the curb cut to be continuous to avoid the need for sidewalk users to have the change of grade.

  • Good point! This is why I asked the developer about converting the garage space to other space if necessary. Garages are good for storage but some people might want a storage room that can also double as a more “usable” room.

  • Tooscrapps

    I imagine that was just a sloppy rendering. I highly doubt the sidewalk would include a step-down as it is shown in the lead picture.

  • Cameron Puetz

    Living space would require completely different and much more expensive construction than a garage, since garages are unheated and usually have no utilities aside from lights and one or two outlets. Even if most people are using the space as storage instead of parking, it would be hard to justify the additional building cost. I’m not sure how many people would have a use for a detached heated room with a rollup door. Since the building has parking in the basement, I’m assuming that the townhouses wouldn’t have the basement storage common in many older buildings. The larger garage seems like a good way to offset that.

  • What do you mean by a peninsula?

  • How can constituents show their support for this project, @shaunjacobsen:disqus?

  • Frank Kotter

    Blanked on the name. ‘Bulb out’ was what I was looking for. Basically a way to deliver riders safely and keep the space free for exactly that purpose.

    But is is the loss of 2 spots, so basically a non-starter.


44-Unit TOD Building Proposed at an Abandoned Drive-Through in Bucktown

A proposal for a transit-oriented development in Bucktown is going before the Chicago Plan Commission for approval this Thursday. River North-based developer Vequity wants to build a six-story residential tower with minimal parking at the southeast corner of Milwaukee and Western avenues in Bucktown, right next door to the Western stop on the Blue Line’s O’Hare branch. Vequity needs the Plan Commission to approve a […]

Why Does Ramirez-Rosa Want to Rezone a Parking Lot by the Logan Stop?

A parking lot next to the Logan Square Blue Line station that’s ripe for redevelopment is under review for a zoning change. 35th Ward alder Carlos Ramirez-Rosa intends to change the zoning district from a very low-density, mixed-use B1-1 designation to RT-4, a residential district designation. That type of zoning allows only single-family homes and two-flats. Rodrigo Anzures-Oyorzabal, […]

The Expanded TOD Ordinance Will Likely Pass Tomorrow, With a Few Tweaks

Tomorrow’s the big day. On Monday, City Council’s Zoning Committee unanimously passed Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s proposed reforms to Chicago’s existing transit-oriented development ordinance. On Thursday, the full council will almost certainly approve the new legislation, paving the way for a new wave of dense, parking-lite development near train stations. However, the committee made three notable […]

New Uptown Buildings Would Have 240 Units, Only 72 Parking Spots

Cedar Street Cos., the company behind the FLATS Chicago developments, which typically involve converting single-room occupancy buildings to more upscale rental units, has proposed two new apartment buildings near the Wilson ‘L’ station in Uptown. One of the buildings would be virtually across the street from the station, at 1050 W. Wilson Ave., and the other […]