“A New Bike Route” No Substitute for Safer Biking on Elston

A_New_Bike_Rolute_Dossier copy
The ANBR route map. Note that the route is slightly less indirect than shown because the street marked as Marcy is actually Clybourn.

Last month when Chicago Department of Transportation staffers discussed plans for buffered bike lanes on Elston between North and Webster at a meeting hosted by the North Branch Works industrial council, there was stiff resistance from local business owners. Although there’s currently a protected lane on the street from Division to North, and a fading conventional lane on this stretch, they argued that encouraging more cycling on the street would interfere with truck movement and endanger bike riders.

As an alternative to upgrading the Elston lanes, the industrial council is now pushing a bike route proposal designed by the architecture firm MAS Studio and bankrolled by Topology, a real estate development company. Dubbed “A New Bike Route,” it features an itinerary connecting the east end of the upcoming Bloomingdale Trail, AKA The 606, to buffered lanes on Wells south of Division, mostly via side streets. The roundabout route includes Cortland, Marcy (although the street shown on the map above is actually Clybourn), Kingsbury (Topology’s office is located at 1422 North Kingsbury), Scott, Cleveland, Hobbie and Hill.

“The idea is to make a bike route that is a good ride as an alternative to simply designating a bike lane for a city street,” said Tom Melk, project leader for Topology . “The route weaves its way past retail areas, the Clybourn Metra stop, schools, and employment centers, and through parks, avoiding anonymous areas like the Elston industrial zone.”

A_New_Bike_lRoute_Dossier copy
Rendering of ANBR on Hill Street by Seward Park.

“The focus is to create a good ride, an interesting ride, and an efficient way to connect Milwaukee Avenue and the new 606 to Michigan Avenue, River North and the Loop while avoiding difficult, unfriendly intersections… or routes through long tedious and uninteresting neighborhood areas,” he added. “Who wants to bike down Elston anyway?”

Actually, lots of people do. CDOT counts conducted in late summer of 2012 observed an average of 219 cyclists on Elston at Division per two-hour peak period. It’s also clear that upgrading the Elston bike lanes would make even more people choose it as a bike route. Bike counts on the street showed a 55 percent increase in cycling after the protected lanes were installed.

While the stretch between North to Webster is wide enough for protected lanes, the business owners are dead-set against the buffered lane proposal, let alone extending the PBLs north, because they fear more cyclists on Elston would interfere with their shipping operations. Their main reason for promoting the ANBR proposal is to get bikes out of the way of their trucks.

The Elston Avenue protected bike lane at Division Street. Photo: John Greenfield

Joe Robinson, a member of Bike Walk Logan Square who teaches at a school on Elston and attended last month’s contentious meeting, doesn’t like the idea of using ANBR to keep cyclists off Elston. “It would send bikers on a convoluted route toward Kingsbury, then east into Lincoln Park, basically avoiding our stretch of Elston altogether,” he said. “It’s a pretty lousy alternative by my assessment, but maybe I’m wrong.”

Actually, in a vacuum, the proposed route does have redeeming qualities. While it’s indirect, it looks to be a fairly pleasant, bike-friendly route. The presentation shows planter-protected, mostly bi-directional bike lanes along almost the entire route, with missing links in the existing street network, such as at Seward Park, connected by off-street paths. If it could actually be built as illustrated, the route would be a true eight-to-eighty facility, suitable for kids and seniors. Of course it’s likely some neighboring businesses, such as the Finkl steel mill on Cortland, would grumble as loudly as their Elston counterparts about having their streets reconfigured.

A_New_Bike_Route_Dos;sier copy
Rendering of Cortland near the Finkl steel mill.

While ANBR has it merits and should be considered for future construction, it’s not a replacement for improving safety on Elston, where people are already riding. The street is a faster, more direct way to get downtown – riding from Cortland/Ashland to Daley Plaza via Elston and Milwaukee is a half mile shorter than taking the alternative route. Elston is a necessary bikeway for accessing popular destinations like Stanley’s produce market, North and Elston, and the Hideout music venue, a block east of Elston on Wabansia. And while Elston could potentially be restriped with buffers this spring, the additional planning and cost required for the innovative ANBR bikeways means it probably couldn’t be built until at least 2015.

View Elston Avenue in a larger map

ANBR, shown in orange, is 4 miles; Elston route, in blue, is 3.5.

CDOT has agreed to take ANBR into consideration, and the route will likely be discussed at another meeting with the Elston business owners in February. MAS and Topology’s proposal seems well-meaning, and an almost fully protected bike route connecting the Bloomingdale with Wells would certainly be a great asset for Chicago. However, the city still needs to improve safety on Elston, the more direct route.

  • Annie F. Adams

    A hope for the 606 shared use walk/bike trail is that groups of 20-40 school kids can walk over and do varieties of activities from nature walks to art projects, Which is cool! I had envisioned it having a protected bike highway and separate path for runners and walkers. So when those 20-40 kids walk up the bike/walk path it won’t work for cycling commuters. But it will for the kids, which is a good thing! (I also think if they park Divvy bikes at either end, the city can monetize the hell out it.) Also there are no bathrooms on the entire stretch of the park. Just saying that is going to be a problem when parents come with their kids to check out the art.

  • Bathrooms…hm. I don’t remember that being a discussion at any of the meetings I went to.

    But you know what was? Parking. Some people were suggesting parking lots, for pete’s sake. Because they didn’t want people driving in from the suburbs and parking in front of their homes.

    At some points, the usable right of way is 16 feet, which isn’t enough for two paths. That’s the width of one good, two-way, Dutch-width bike path!

  • David Altenburg

    I live right next to the Bloomingdale, so I’ve given a bit of thought as to whether I’ll realistically use it for commuting, and I actually think I might.

    Currently, I take Milwaukee Ave downtown, and it takes me about 10 minutes to get to Milwaukee and Leavitt, where there’s a planned access point to the Bloomingdale. Much of that time is waiting for a couple stoplights that are unavoidable due to their timing.

    It would be about a mile on the Bloomingdale for me to get to the same intersection, so, even if I had to slow down to a crawl – 8 miles per hour, I could still have a faster commute on the Bloomingdale. It seems that the same reasoning could apple to lots of people who live in Humboldt Park or southern Logan Square. The key is avoiding stop lights.

    Now, whether I’ll want to take the slow, scenic route versus riding in traffic is yet to be determined.

  • David Altenburg

    I remember at the community meetings leading up to the design, the conflicts on the LFP were frequently mentioned. To address this fear, someone brought up charts showing usage of various multi-use paths in the US. The LFP was by an order of magnitude the busiest (with Venice Beach being a distant second, if I remember correctly). The point being, that a lot of the LFP conflicts are due as much to its high level of usage as to its shared nature.

    Honestly, if the trail becomes so busy that it’s really full of all different types of users on weekdays during rush hour, I think it’ll be a great problem to have, and it’ll really be transformative for the neighborhoods it goes through. I would much rather see that happen than have it fall into disuse (and disrepair) over its first decade.

  • Annie F. Adams

    When folks are holding anxious looking kids and ask “Where are the bathrooms?” just say “by the parking lot.” :) I was discussing the possibilities of a 606 placemaking installation of 100 community donated (or made by local kids) chairs transformed with text based artwork by sign painters, local kids and passersby. It was the programmer who pointed out the bathroom conundrum. I think they will need porta potties for at least opening weekend. & yes when I was actually up there I realized how small the right of way was. It was surprising. I was also amazed by how many people (men & women) were up there doing a variety of activities. It will be a very successful space! It already is in many ways.

  • cjlane


    Plenty of conflicting goings on. Much of it summarized here:


    The parcel was (apparently seriously) suggested for the DePaul arena, and there’s a lot of sentiment (perhaps some astroturfed) to de-PMDing it, BUT there’s that grant application and receipt.

    Now, of course, as these things go in Chicago, the $200k study grant could be in service of a determination that retaining the PMD makes no economic sense, thus shielding all involved from being the person who makes the decision that makes somebody’s brother in law tens of millions of dollars.


Business Owners on Elston Won’t Fight Buffered Bike Lanes

It’s official: business owners along the Elston industrial corridor are giving up their fight against better bike lanes on the street. In December, when Chicago Department of Transportation staff discussed plans for buffered bike lanes on Elston between North and Webster at a meeting hosted by the North Branch Works industrial council, there was stiff […]

CDOT Is Moving Forward With Buffered Bike Lanes on Elston

It’s good to see that new Chicago Department of Transportation Commissioner Rebekah Scheinfeld is standing her ground on the Elston bike lane issue. In December, when CDOT staffers discussed plans for buffered bike lanes on Elston between North and Webster at a meeting hosted by the North Branch Works industrial council, there was stiff resistance […]

Planning Study for Finkl Steel Site Needs to Consider Transit and Biking

With Finkl & Sons Steel vacating 22 acres along Cortland Street between Clybourn Avenue and the Chicago River, the U.S. Environental Protection Agency has given the economic development corporation North Branch Works $200,000 to create a plan that keeps the area industrial. As part of this process, it’s important for walking, biking, and transit to be integrated […]