It Doesn’t Matter Who Issues Parking Tickets as Long as They Do It Well

Photo: Joseph Dennis

Mike Brockway of the Expired Meter has a story on DNAinfo today breaking the news that non-government workers have been issuing parking tickets since 2010. Brockway reports that people who work for LAZ Parking — hired by Chicago Parking Meters, the city’s private concessionaire — and not for the city have been enforcing parking regulations.

Some passages in the article read like this should be considered a scandal (the private workers have been “quietly issuing hundreds of thousands of tickets”), but the LAZ workers are not issuing tickets surreptitiously. They wear uniforms, carry equipment, and do the same job as those who work for the Department of Finance.

What’s happening is pretty ordinary: Some people continue to park beyond their purchased time, or don’t purchase time at all, LAZ workers are writing them tickets, and the city is collecting the fines. This was the arrangement spelled out in the parking meter contract. (There are a lot of things wrong with the parking meter deal — the city never should have given away control of its metered parking, especially not for a short-term budget gimmick — but enforcement of the rules isn’t one of them.)

Maybe there are some interesting differences between the private enforcement agents and the city-employed agents. Is one type of enforcement agent more efficient than the other, and thus a better value to city taxpayers? If so, it would make sense to assign that group a larger share of the citation load. If each private enforcement worker issues more tickets per day than city employees, or vice versa, that indicates that parking enforcement could be improved. And more thorough parking enforcement will encourage more turnover, reduce traffic caused by people cruising for spaces, and allow more people to park at and patronize businesses.

We need more information to judge the impact of private enforcement agents, and I’d like to see Brockway go further with the data without implying that more parking enforcement is a bad thing.


More Parking Meters Would Help, Not Hurt, City Neighborhoods

It turns out that, despite Chicago’s disastrous parking meter deal, the city government can still use meters to benefit neighborhoods. During a recent discussion of Chicago’s parking challenges and their accompanying report, Metropolitan Planning Council vice president Peter Skosey and research director Chrissy Mancini Nichols told me how the city can make lemonade out of this lemon […]

Renegotiated Parking Meter Deal Is a Mixed Blessing

Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s announcement today that he has renegotiated the city’s much-hated parking meter contract to save an estimated $1 billion over the next 71 years appears to be a big win for Chicago residents. The introduction of a new pay-by-cell option, albeit with a 35-cent convenience fee, also seems to be a good thing. […]

The Real Reason There Are Speed Cams by Challenger Park

Uptown’s Challenger Playlot Park is the poster child for the anti-traffic camera crowd. Along with Mulberry Playlot Park, in the McKinley Park neighborhood, Challenger is frequently cited as a small, little-used park that’s not even visible from the locations of speed cameras that are supposedly there to protect park users. This is proof, according to […]