Where Do Lightfoot and Preckwinkle Stand on Transportation Issues?
Yesterday’s Chicago mayoral election was a win for social justice, since the April 2 runoff will include former Chicago Police Board president and attorney Lori Lightfoot, and current Cook County board president Toni Preckwinkle. That makes the runoff a contest between two candidates who are running as progressives, and guarantees that the next person to lead Chicago will be a woman of color, a first for our city. (Lightfoot would also be Chicago’s first openly LGBT mayor.)
The election outcome was also a victory for sustainable transportation. Bill Daley, whom most pundits (myself included) predicted would make it to the runoff, was just about the only candidate who had anything positive to say about Elon Musk’s Jetsons-esque scheme to build an O’Hare Express transit system using “electric sleds. Although current mayor Rahm Emanuel has championed the proposal, Lightfoot and Preckwinkle have both spoken disparagingly of it, which makes it much less likely this boondoggle will be moving forward in the future.
Moreover, judging from what they’ve said at candidates forums and on questionnaires (although, unfortunately, neither one responded to Streetsblog’s survey) both Lightfoot and Preckwinkle appear to be generally on the right page when it comes to sustainable transportation and traffic safety issues. But let’s take a deeper dive into exactly where each of the mayoral hopefuls stands on some of the issues.
Both Lightfoot and Preckwinkle have thrown shade on Elon Musk’s proposal in the past. Lightfoot previously told the Chicago Tribune that Musk’s and the Emanuel administration’s claim that taxpayers won’t wind up subsidizing the system is “a fiction.”
At the Transit4All forum last month, Preckwinkle said the express “is definitely something I would put on pause. If we’re going to make investments in transit, I think they should be investments in the CTA and in Metra.”
Both candidates have endorsed the Active Transportation Alliance’s call for 100 miles of new bike lanes over the four years, including 50 miles of protected lanes. “We must drastically expand the quality and quantity of bike lanes in our city,” Lightfoot said in her response to the Active Trans questionnaire.
“I fully understand and appreciate the importance of multimodal transportation, specifically with dedicated and protected bike lanes,” Preckwinkle said in her response to the Active Trans survey. “As Mayor, I will work to find the revenue to establish these projects.”
The Active Trans questionnaire asked if candidates would commit to earmarking $20 million a year for pedestrian and bike safety infrastructure, with a focus on reducing collisions in high-crash areas in underserved communities. Lightfoot said yes. “Chicago’s Vision Zero [plan] has the ambitious goal to eliminate death and serious injuries resulting from traffic crashes, but clearly more must be done to make this goal a reality,” she responded. “My administration will reallocate $20 million from existing Chicago Department of Transportation funding to establish a new annual budget line item dedicated to building safe streets.”
Preckwinkle declined to commit to that number. “While I will continue to invest in funds for biking and walking projects, my immediate priority will continue to be towards transit and other transportation alternatives,” she said. “I am hesitant to pre-determine dollar amounts in budgets. I am committed to bike/walk transportation, but I am also committed to smart budgeting. Therefore… I may dedicate the $20 million suggested or could be more.”
Speeding up buses
Both women have voiced support for strategies to improve bus travel times and reliability and reverse falling ridership. The Active Trans Questionnaire asked if the candidates are in favor of creating 50 miles of transit-priority streets with car-free bus lanes and bus-friendly traffic signals. Lightfoot said she supports this goal and would install bus lanes on some streets and full-fledged bus rapid transit, including prepaid boarding and raised platforms, on others. She mentioned Chicago Avenue, Cottage Grove, Puslaski, and Halsted as potential routes, as well as bringing back the Emanuel administration’s shelved plan for the Ashland BRT “with community support.”
Preckwinkle also signed on to the 50-mile goal, although she gave fewer specifics, simply stating, “I will develop and implement a plan that identifies priority corridors based on community input to identify where the maximum impact and benefit can be achieved.”
Reduced or free CTA fares
Lightfoot and Preckwinkle have both said they’re in favor of some kind of break on transit fares for low-income people, youth, and/or seniors. The Tribune reported that, at a West Side forum in January, both candidates said they’d support free rides for kids and the elderly. However, a few days later Preckwinkle cautioned against more free rides at a panel discussion in Pilsen. Not long after that, Preckwinkle said at the Transit4All forum, “The population that needs reduced fares [is] students.” So that’s a little confusing.
But here’s what the women put in writing in response to Active Trans question about whether they’d support establishing a 50 percent discounted CTA, Metra and Pace fare for residents at or below the federal poverty line. “I support reduced fares for vulnerable populations and will seek to restore the 50 percent cut in the state subsidy CTA receives for providing free and reduced rides to students and other groups,” Lightfoot state. She added that she would work with the Chicago Public Schools to provide free transit rides to low-income students, and that she’d seek to expand the time and days CPS students can use free or reduced fare cards.
Preckwinkle responded, “I fully support such an initiative on grounds of inclusivity. We need to be looking at every option to improve and increase ridership. This initiative will require new, unprecedented levels of inter-agency collaboration and infrastructure.”
Regulating and taxing Uber and Lyft
The candidates agree that we need to reign in ride-share to improve safety and keep it from causing more congestion and transit ridership losses. The Active Trans survey asked the hopefuls if they supported having “Uber/Lyft pay a higher city fee when driving in congested areas during rush hour with no or only one passenger.” Lightfoot said she would “help write and introduce an ordinance to increase fees for ride-hail trips that begin in the Loop. In the future, my administration will explore expanding this fee to rides originating in areas of the city with reliable 24-hour public transportation.” She said this revenue would be earmarked for the construction of bus lanes and increasing bus and ‘L’ service.
“We need to tax ride-share and car-sharing,” Preckwinkle said at the Transit4All forum. “Ride-sharing and car-sharing have a place, but they’re not as well-regulated as the taxi industry.” She also brought up the idea of further taxing ride-share to fund transit at the discussion in Pilsen. In response to the Active Trans question, she said, “I want people to use transit, and I want to build a world class transit system. We need to look at ways to reduce congestion.”
In a nutshell, both Lightfoot and Preckwinkle have fairly progressive transportation platforms. Lightfoot tended to mention more specific ideas in her responses to the Active Trans questionnaire. But Preckwinkle showed up for the transit forums, and she’s racked up some credibility with initiatives like Cook County’s first long-range transportation plan in the modern era. So no matter who wins in April, we’re not going to get stuck with a motorhead for mayor.