Never Mind the NIMBYs, the North Branch Trail Extension Is a Go

FPDCC superintendent Arnold Randall, CDOT’s Janet Attarian, CMAP director Joseph Szabo, 39th Ward alderman Margaret Laurino, Congressman Mike Quigley’s spokeswoman Mary Ann Levar, and Gustav Sobolak, break ground on the trail extension. Photo: Jeff Zoline.

Despite Not In My Back Yard-type opposition from some nearby residents, the Forest Preserves of Cook County is proceeding with plans to extend its popular North Branch Trail three miles further southeast into the city limits. Officials broke ground on the new segment of the path at a ceremony yesterday morning at Thaddeus S. “Ted” Lechowicz Woods, 5901 North Central.

The existing North Branch Trail has Chicago trailheads at Devon/Caldwell and Devon/Milwaukee, near the legendary Superdawg drive-in. It runs 18 miles past the North Branch of the Chicago River and the Skokie Lagoons to the Chicago Botanic Gardens in Glencoe.

The first phase of the construction will build 1.8 miles of paved trail from Devon/Caldwell to Forest Glen, with completion expected this spring. The second stage will add another 1.2 miles, terminating at Gompers Park near FPCC’s LaBagh Woods and Irene C. Hernandez Picnic Grove at Foster/Kostner.

“This allows us to eventually connect one of the Forest Preserves’ trails to the city of Chicago’s Lakefront Trail, which has been part of both agencies’ long range plans to bring together two of the region’s best used trails,” FPCC chief Arnold Randall said in a statement.

If the Chicago Department of Transportation follows through with plans to build the Weber Spur Trail, the North Branch extension will connect with it in LaBagh Woods.

The North Branch project will cost about $7.2 million. 80 percent of that comes from federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality money and Transportation Alternatives Program funds, administered by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning. Most of the required 20 percent local match is being funded by FPCC, with $192K coming from Chicago’s Open Space Impact Fees program.

“The North Branch Trail Extension will encourage more outdoor activities, boost bicycling and provide a healthy transportation alternative,” said 39th ward alderman Margaret Laurino in a statement. “In addition to the trail being good for the environment, the city money is not coming from taxpayers, but rather from Open Space Impact Fees which are collected from new residential developments to help finance public open space improvements.”

Over the past few years, there have been several public meetings regarding the trail extension where local residents and trail users provided feedback about the project. Many neighbors and members of the bike community have supported the initiative, as have Congressman Mike Quigley, the Illinois Department of Transportation, the Active Transportation Alliance, Trails for Illinois, and the United States Bicycle Route System.

However, there has been opposition from some residents in the surrounding neighborhoods of Old Edgebrook & Indian Woods. They’ve expressed concerns about construction detours and noise, flooding, and the removal of trees – about 450 will be lost.

North Branch Trail southern extension map
A side path will parallel Central Avenue, crossing two streets leading into the Old Edgebrook subdivision.

There have also been concerns over the alignment of the proposed trail route, which has been updated several times due to community feedback. One of the biggest challenges is how to safely route the trail through the high traffic area around the busy Devon/Lehigh/Caldwell/Central intersection.

Most of the motorized traffic runs east-west along Devon Avenue and northwest-southeast along Caldwell Avenue (US Route 14). There is also heavy traffic along Central, which runs through forest preserves south of Devon, with no stoplights until Elston.

All of these roads cross high-traffic railroad tracks used by Metra’s Milwaukee District / North Line, Amtrak and Canadian Pacific freight trains. When a train passes through the area, it adds to the existing congestion.

Many residents have expressed concern about how close the trail will pass through this busy area and especially how it will impact traffic along the busy stretch of Central south of the triangle. The Old Edgebrook subdivision can only be accessed by Louise and Prescott avenues, small streets that intersect with Central.

Some Old Edgebrook residents are worried that it will be difficult to see bicyclists crossing Louise and Prescott on the new sidepath along Central. However, Central already has a sidewalk at these locations, so drivers must already watch for pedestrians crossing at the two locations.

There are also concerns over how the trail will cross over the railroad tracks. Two bridges will be built over the tracks and the river to allow safe crossing.

Residents have also expressed worries about increased crime due to the trail providing a link between their neighborhoods and other Chicago communities. However the existing trail runs already through several different neighborhoods and suburbs, and very few reported crimes have occurred on the path, according to the FPCC.

The forest preserve district should be commended for forging ahead with the project in spite of these NIMBY arguments. The three new miles of multi-use trail will be a great asset for Chicago and surrounding communities.

  • JeffParkNIMBY

    Don’t tell the Old Edgebrook NIMBYs about this story. They will come here and tell them no one listened to them and that their lives are ruined because they have to watch for cross traffic. I’m sure they are concerned about our safety and not the fact they are driving recklessly.

  • planetshwoop

    That would be my unidentified child. He really enjoyed the chance to play in the dirt.

    Worth noting that the trail is going to run past two Metra stations, so in addition to all the recreation stuff it helps people connect to transit.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Updated with Gustav’s name!

  • johnaustingreenfield

    In fairness, the Old Edgebrook NIMBYs are also worried about people pedaling up from other Chicago neighborhoods and stealing their lawn flamingos.

  • JeffParkNIMBY

    In fairness, their lawn flamingos are solid gold, and they aren’t afraid to threaten to sue.

  • OE-flamingo-wrangler

    Loving some of the cyclist posters on this topic – safety is a joke, people worried about a collision with a bike are just “wreckless,” and after you’ve already gotten what you want, you should go online and insult a whole neighborhood of people you don’t know.

    Maybe drop it? Or keep acting like a badass 14 year old – whatever.

  • JeffParkNIMBY

    No, they can’t have it both ways. They say they care about pedestrian safety and then do not shovel their sidewalks during major snowstorms, like the one in November.

    I drive through the area in question far more than I bike, for the record. If you try to go 30mph on Central, you are passed by people in the right lane doing at least 40mph, if not more. They don’t seem to care about that safety aspect because it never came up during their objections.

    The sidewalks in the area are RIGHT NEXT TO THE STREET. If any of those 40mph cars jump the curb and you’re there, you’re dead.

    People will be safer on the path than anywhere near the street the Old Edgebrook NIMBYs didn’t try to fix.

  • OE-flamingo-wrangler

    I love it. “They” have solid gold lawn flamingos, but not a dime for snow removal. Right.

  • JeffParkNIMBY

    You don’t believe that rich people are cheap? What’s so hard to believe?

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Nobody is claiming the path opponents are “wreckless.” If only they were — we could use far fewer car wrecks in this city. Unfortunately, they’re *reckless*.

  • OE-flamingo-wrangler

    Ugh – the only thing worse than a rich cheapskate from OE is a rich cheapskate from OE who can’t spell or shovel. ?

  • rohmen

    I’m glad to see the trail work finally beginning, and I think the planners likely did the best they could here regarding the design given the area, but mid-block trail crossings ARE pretty horrible design-wise IMHO.

    No idea regarding traffic volumes moving off/on Central, but other trails I’ve ridden with mid-block crossings often deal with the safety issue they present by placing a stop sign on the trail and leaving it up to cyclists/pedestrians to cross safely. Cars then end up with the idea that cyclists and peds. should yield to them until it’s safe to cross, rather than the other way around.

    That’s not great planning if our goal is to minimize pedestrian/car conflicts in the long run. Hopefully this mid-block crossing incorporates something to ensure cars actually slow down in the area, like speed bumps or at least decent attention-grabbing road markings for the crossing.

  • planetshwoop

    The traffic volumes are likely tiny. There are less than 50 houses in the neighborhood that is impacted. The plans I saw called for a jug-handle design that would encourage cyclists to slow down. But I’d also say… most of us are used slowing down for sidewalks. There was an existing sidewalk at the two impacted intersections, but it was horribly maintained as most neighbors would go through the back pedestrian entrance near Devon to the neighborhood, not Central.


More from Marge: Alderman Laurino Talks Trails, Bike Sharing

Margaret Laurino with constituent and Grid Chicago commenter Bob Kastigar. Since Checkerboard City, my weekly column that runs in print in Newcity magazine, is limited to about 1,000 words, some good material from my recent interview with bike-friendly 39th Ward Alderman Margaret Laurino wound up on the cutting room floor. She had interesting things to […]