Why Hong Kong Got an Express Train to the Airport and Why Chicago Shouldn’t Get One

A Hong Kong Airport Express train. Photo: Shankar S.
A Hong Kong Airport Express train. Photo: Shankar S.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has noted that Hong Kong is a world class city with an express train to its airport, and O’Hare should have one like it to attract more business travelers to Chicago. There’s a good backstory about how Hong Kong got an airport express, but it doesn’t support Emanuel’s push for one.

I spent last weekend in Hong Kong and rode the express train roundtrip, and I experienced first hand what a premium airport train looks and feels like. I also learned how it was funded. The Hong Kong Airport Express is unique in that it’s the only train to the airport and it was privately funded by real estate revenues. Emanuel has repeatedly said the goal of the O’Hare Express project “is to ensure that no taxpayer money is used.”

The Hong Kong airport train is a high-speed and premium rail service between three downtown stations and the Hong Kong International Airport that debuted in July 1998, when the airport opened. The most expensive one-way journey is $13, but you can save money by purchasing a roundtrip ticket, or paying for your ride along with a multi-day pass. I paid $39 for a roundtrip ticket and three days of unlimited rides on the subway. You can get from downtown to the airport in less than 25 minutes. By comparison, the city of Chicago has said an O’Hare Express ride would probably cost about $30.

MTR built and operates the express train. It’s a publicly-traded corporation and the Hong Kong government is the majority shareholder. This is the most significant difference between Hong Kong and any potential scenario in Chicago. Despite Emanuel’s assurances it seems unlikely that building a new train line to O’Hare would be profitable, so the project would probably have to involve public funds.

The Hong Kong Airport Express has on-board information screens and luggage racks.
The Hong Kong Airport Express has on-board information screens and luggage racks.

The Hong Kong Airport Express was funded solely by MTR, which earns most of its revenues by developing and leasing buildings above and adjacent to its stations for offices, residential towers, and malls — lots and lots of malls. MTR also builds and operates the city’s subways, and it’s one of the only transit agencies in the world that makes a profit. Imagine if the CTA was able to run trains more frequently to nicer stations because it earned money from developing the land along the Orange Line that’s currently occupied by parking lots.

The Hong Kong Airport Express remains the only train to the local airport, so there’s no competition for a comfortable train ride into the city center. Other transportation options include taxis, and a well-developed bus network.

On the other hand, O’Hare is already served by the Blue Line, which has 24 hour service to downtown and many neighborhoods. Local bus service is only available at the Rosemont station one stop away on the Blue Line, and since departing O’Hare on the Blue Line costs $5 instead of the normal $2.25, it costs a minimum of $5.25 to use a Pace or CTA bus from O’Hare.

Even though the Hong Kong Airport Express the only train service to its airport, less than a quarter of Hong Kong airport passengers use it. However, the airport express won’t necessarily have any funding problems due to low ridership because MTR subsidizes all its lines with its real estate operation. In contrast, low ridership on the express train to Toronto’s Pearson Airport – another example Emanuel cited – has been a major financial issue, which has forced the operator to lower the fare multiple times in an effort to attract more customers.

Again, it’s highly likely that the O’Hare Express will be built without using public funds. $2 million in funds paid by O’Hare passengers is being used to pay for the current study for the project. And it doesn’t make sense to ask all Chicago taxpayers to fund a rail service that is only going to be used by those who can expense the tickets.

As an alternative to spending billions on a new rail line that would likely see little ridership, the Chicago CTA could add a number of relatively inexpensive features to the Blue Line that would improve the rider experience for all customers, while also making the train more appealing to tourists and business travelers. These include:

  • Luggage racks
  • Elevators at the remaining 12 stations without them between the airport and downtown
  • Onboard TVs with multilingual service announcements, plus info on nearby points of interest and hotels
  • Free Wi-Fi and phone charging ports
  • Points of interest maps in the stations – it’s really common in subways in Asia to identify and mark each exit with a letter. Maps identify popular destinations at street level and tell you which exit is nearest.
Hong Kong station map showing which exit is best to access a particular point of interest.
Hong Kong station map showing which exit is best to access a particular point of interest.

Info screens would reassure tourists and business travelers who are traveling to an unfamiliar destination. Making the Internet available would allow them to to look up maps or communicate with their hotel.

Another amenity that the cash-rich MTR is able to provide for express train riders is a free shuttle bus from downtown stations to hotels. The CTA could market its own bus routes as a complementary service to take visitors between Blue Line stations at Chicago, Grand, and Clark/Lake to their downtown hotels on Michigan Avenue and include a free transfer to buses in the tickets purchased at O’Hare. Indeed, the Hong Kong airport express train gives riders a free transfer to subway lines.

In a nutshell, the CTA should provide a world-class experience onboard its existing airport train line rather than build an expensive new one.

If Emanuel is really wants to make the train more attractive to well-heeled travelers, it might be feasible to turn one car of the eight cars on each Blue Line train into a first-class carriage, complete with more comfortable seating and tray tables, plus other amenities. That would reduce the capacity of each train, but the CTA could make up for it by running more trains, which could possibly be funded by the extra revenue from the first-class cars.

While improving what we’ve got may not be as as glamorous as building a shiny, new train line, these commonsense solutions would help Chicago’s airport train service compete with the best systems in the world, without spending billions of dollars to do so.

Updated to change the source of $2 million for the study from tax revenues to airport passengers (the “Passenger Facility Charge” on flight tickets). 

  • I love it when you talk dirty.

  • undercover epicurean

    The CTA could market its own bus routes as a complementary service to take visitors between Blue Line stations at Chicago, Grand, and Clark/Lake to their downtown hotels on Michigan Avenue

    I wish the CTA would look at Grand as a potential BRT route, it would make so much sense to link the Blue Line to all the hotels & offices in River North/Streeterville & Navy Pier.

  • Jacob Wilson

    I really wish calling something ‘privately funded’ (regardless of whether it actually is or not) didn’t have such a sedative effect on the public’s ability to reason.

    So private developers are SO flush in cash that they can build a redundant luxury train line but the CTA can’t get it’s basic needs met and we can’t pay our teachers?

    It doesn’t make it any less despicable or unacceptable whether the funds are public or private that the working class begs for scraps while the wealthy create a boondoggle so the all important ‘business’ people don’t have to mix with the plebeians on the blue line.

  • Steve Brown

    Honestly, if what they want is an exclusive service for wealthy business travelers that don’t want to share quarters with the sweating masses on the filthy, foul-smelling, excrement-soaked Blue Line (and who can blame them!), they could just put a First Class car on the back of every Blue Line train and charge double fare for it. Probably help plug the CTA’s budget, too.

  • I thought about suggesting that the CTA add a first class car, but there’s a problem. The CTA can’t extend the trains to have nine cars (really it would be 10 cars because they’re all “married pairs”) because the stations aren’t long enough. Let’s say you replace one of the eight cars with a first class car. Now you have seven regular cars and one first class car. You’ve reduced the capacity of that train, and that’s not in the city’s best interest. The CTA would have to run more trains to make up for the lost capacity and that’s expensive.

    Aside: One of the subway lines in Hong Kong has a first class car. You tap into the station to pay the base/regular fare, and then you tap on a special kiosk to deduct the first class car supplement. There are more seats on the first class car – that’s the only benefit, that you get to sit.

  • I’m all for the CTA and Metra using their extensive property for real estate development. There’s no reason you can’t build something atop the stations (elevated and at-grade), and both have extensive real estate that’s currently wasted as…parking lots.

  • skelter weeks

    “Local bus service is only available at the Rosemont station one stop away on the Blue Line”.
    Not accurate. Pace buses 250 & 330 serve O’Hare at the ATS station. And the Metra station is nearby. Also, if you just wanted to go to Rosemont or DesPlaines, hop on a free hotel shuttle. They won’t mind.

  • kastigar

    It wouldn’t be cheap, but why couldn’t the Metra NCS service be diverted so that the Rosemont stop was actually inside O’Hare Field terminal?

    http://tinyurl.com/mpr5ghv

  • JacobEPeters

    If the doors to the “first class cars” only opened at O’Hare (where the platforms are longer) and Washington (where platform space exists between it & the Monroe stop), then it could be an extra 2 cars added on. Even then, I am not sure you can have those cars attached without a secondary means of egress between the first class cars & the remaining cars in case of an emergency. Which we know would just be used for moving between trains the same way that the existing doors are used because we don’t have open gangway rolling stock. Which would eliminate the reason to pay extra to ride a first class car.

  • planetshwoop

    Part of any funds to improve the Blue Line should include funds to provide shelter to many of Chicago’s homeless. The Blue Line hosts many when it’s cold and providing compassionate care would partner well with other amenities like luggage racks.

  • planetshwoop

    I still think it would make a lot of sense to have an Amtrak station there — if you can deplane and take the train for the last 3 hours of your journey it’s easier than having to lug your stuff to Union.

  • planetshwoop

    Have you been to Boston? The bus undergoes this amazing transformation from bus to underground subway bus. You could built a BRT “line” that’s in the same network as the el to enable seamless transfers and call it rapid transit!

  • Pat

    No Amtrak lines go through that area though.

  • Frank Kotter

    Why not build a transportation center where the Blue, the Hiawatha, the Empire Builder, the MD-N, The UP-NW, the I90 and the I94 converge at a single location? From this point build the then feasible express to Ohare.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0628e0781fbf7ab8a69006aec6da33708c3394cddacbbd323b3774f26bf8fcf1.gif
    It is actually a testament to the dysfunction of American transportation infrastructure planning that this is not already there.

  • Frank Kotter

    No, but Montrose has it all.

  • Eric

    Revenue from the new AirBNB tax is supposed to go towards homelessness: http://www.chicagohomeless.org/mayors-city-budget-includes-new-increased-funding-affordable-housing-services-homeless-families/ but more energy, money, etc. should be dedicated to the issue.

  • Eric

    Hopefully some staff at the CTA/ city reads this article as technical assistance. Great recommendations that are inexpensive and easy to implement, AKA “quick wins”.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

High Speed Rail Association: Use Metra Tracks for O’Hare Express

|
Mayor Rahm Emanuel and aviation commissioner Ginger Evans stated earlier this year that creating an express train to O’Hare Airport is a priority for this administration. However, the Blue Line is already a fairly speedy way to get to the airport, which could easily be upgraded via a few short-term improvements. Therefore, the city might be […]

More Ideas for Improving Rail Service at O’Hare Right Now

|
Last week’s Streetblog Chicago post about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s O’Hare express train proposal struck a chord with readers, with dozens of retweets and almost 100 comments. Lots of people agreed that the existing CTA Blue Line run between the Loop and “the world’s busiest airport” is already a relatively fast, high-quality service. Many readers also concurred that […]