Why Is the Lakefront Plowed but Not the Bloomingdale?

The 606 is also a commuting route, so it should be maintained during winter

The north Lakefront Trail was in great shape yesterday evening, but not The 606. Photo: John Greenfield
The north Lakefront Trail was in great shape yesterday evening, but not The 606. Photo: John Greenfield

First off, a tip of the helmet to the Chicago Park District for doing an excellent job with plowing and salting the North Lakefront Trail following last weekend’s four-inch snowfall. When I’ve ridden it this week, in most places the path has been about as easy to ride on as in July — easier actually because it’s not clogged with tons of pedestrians and cyclists (which itself is a good problem to have). Take a virtual ride on the trail with me in yesterday’s 10-degree weather here.

I haven’t made it to the south lakefront this week, but I’ve been seeing reports that it’s in pretty good shape as well. The park district’s diligence with clearing the Lakefront Trail makes a lot of sense, because it’s important for transportation as well as recreation. Even in cold weather, many Chicagoans rely on it as a safe, car-free bike commuting route.

The same is true with the Near Northwest Side’s Bloomingdale Trail, aka The 606, which was partly funded by federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds because it was intended to serve as a transportation corridor, not just a place to catch some rays or get a workout. 21 schools are located within a half mile of the Bloomingdale, so many families use it to walk or bike to school, even during the winter.

15541986_10210992595468758_7437440769351836341_n
The Bloomingdale Trail this morning. Photo: Michael Burton

However, folks near The 606 have reported that, almost a week after the snow ended, the trail still hasn’t been plowed, and it’s still basically impassible for bikes. Feet and motor vehicle tires (which indicate that there would be no problem getting a plow up on the elevated trail) have mashed down the unplowed snow, and it has frozen into a treacherous tundra, they say.

“The conditions are terrible for anything besides falling down,” says Ira Cox, who often commutes on the trail with his two young children. Meanwhile, Wabansia and Cortland, the nearby parallel surface streets, are also in bad shape, so people on bikes are pretty much stuck using busy Armitage Avenue, or downright dangerous North Avenue, as alternatives, according to Cox.

“With more snow predicted this weekend we won’t be clearing [The 606],” a spokesperson from the park district replied when I asked about plowing plans yesterday on Twitter. “We encourage trail users to use The 606 for winter sport activities, such as snowshoeing & cross country skiing.” They encouraged residents to follow @The606Chicago for updates and share photos the park district with the hashtag .

The thing is, that response doesn’t really line up with the policy that was posted on the official website for The 606 yesterday:

The Chicago Park District will remove snow and keep the center of the trail clear in all but the heaviest snowfalls. [Emphasis added.] We can’t clear the full width in order to protect rubber running surfaces. Please keep in mind winter sports (snowshoeing, cross country skiing) are only allowed when part of official programming. That’ll help keep the trail open and safe at its slimmed down winter width. Please steer clear of snow removal crews.

Four inches of the white stuff doesn’t seem to qualify as one of “the heaviest snowfalls” of the winter. While I’m personally stoked to go cross-country skiing on the unplowed sections on the Bloomingdale, it seems like it should be easy for the park district to have an employee do a single pass with a snowplow in the middle of the trail shortly after a storm. It certainly seems like it would be cheaper to do this than to settle any legitimate personal injury lawsuits that may ensue after someone wipes out on the icy unplowed trail.

Update 12/16/16 3:45 p.m. After my Twitter exchange with the park district yesterday, the text on The 606 website was edited:

The Chicago Park District will remove snow and keep the center of the trail clear when there is a minor snowfall. When the path is being cleared, please be advised, the full width of the trail cannot be cleared to protect rubber running surfaces on the edges. In order to protect the trail and plants, only a brush can be used to remove snow and a solution called CMA in place of salt to stop ice from forming. Please steer clear of snow removal crews.

In the event of a significant snowfall (ranging from 3-6 inches and dependent on additional factors such as wind and snow wetness), the Chicago Park District will not remove snow in efforts to promote winter activities. Please keep in mind winter sports (snowshoeing, cross country skiing) are only allowed and encouraged on the trail when snow exceeds 3 inches.

It’s certainly important not to damage the Bloomingdale Trail surface or plants. But it seems that if it’s possible to plow the asphalt Lakefront Trail on a regular basis, the park district should be able to figure out a safe way to clear heavier snow on the concrete Bloomingdale as well.

This post is made possible by a grant from the Illinois Bicycle Lawyers at Keating Law Offices, P.C., a Chicago, Illinois law firm committed to representing pedestrians and cyclists. The content is Streetsblog Chicago’s own, and Keating Law Offices neither endorses the content nor exercises any editorial control.

  • Just shovel or plow it yourself for awhile, then stop. People will flood the lines asking why, which will hopefully spur the City to not shirk the duty anymore.

  • skyrefuge

    Oh man, has the designer of the new layout never used the Internet before? The ALL-CAPS rendering of the sub-headline is unintentionally hilarious, it sounds like John has just wiped out on the 606, and as he brushes the yellow snow off his face, angrily screams at a nearby Park District employee, “THE 606 IS ALSO A COMMUTING ROUTE, SO IT SHOULD BE MAINTAINED DURING WINTER!!!”

    Also, how can a website with the word “blog” IN ITS URL (see what I did there?) not list all posts in reverse-chronological order? That identifying feature is literally the second line in the Wikipedia entry for “blog”!

  • So >6 inches of snowfall would be super-significant?

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Yeah, the all-caps thing is a bug which will be fixed. Editor-in-chief Ben Fried discussed this in his introduction to the new design: “While we’ve cleaned up the look and feel and introduced some content hierarchy on each Streetsblog site (you’ll notice major stories stick at the top longer than they used to), we’re also staying true to our bloggy roots. Below those top three stories, you’ll still find a reverse-chronological flow of content.” And don’t worry about the yellow snow thing — I’ve listed to plenty of Zappa.

  • Grogg

    Thanks John, let’s keep the pressure on. Biking on the street is never more dangerous than in the winter, and therefore the 606 is never more necessary. And plowing down the middle does almost nothing anyway– lets demand plowing the whole thing up to the blue. The excuse that they’re worried about damaging the blue shouldn’t stand. I believe in their employees’ abiity to plow accurately and damage-free.

  • Robert

    The 606 was plowed regularly last winter, and I ran on it frequently. What changed?

  • Elbert Dempsey

    This is Shitcago and the answer is always the same. What ever the question was the answer is money.

  • planetshwoop

    I don’t use the 606, but stories like this are why I donate. Nice work here.

  • skyrefuge

    Yeah, plenty of blogs these days have a section for highlighted stories, but in every other example I can think of, those stories are duplicated in the reverse-chronological list as well. Here, if they’re in the top section, they aren’t in the reverse-chronological list, so it confuses a blog-focused reader as to whether the top stories are new or old and what he’s already read and what he hasn’t. Maybe that’s just an artifact of the transition, and will be fixed once the highlighted stories are all “new”? Ok, I’ll try to make this the end of my pedantic whining!

  • Thanks for your donation!

    Just guessing…you don’t use it because you don’t live nearby?

  • Yeah, that’s what I was remembering, too!
    I actually live near it and I was using it every day to get from Humboldt Boulevard to Milwaukee Avenue. Now I have to take more dangerous surface streets and take the lane in front of sometimes-impatient motorists.

  • planetshwoop

    Yes, more or less. I live in Albany Park so it doesn’t go anywhere l need to go.

  • Jason

    It barely snowed last year. Which is why it may have appeared to have been clear last year.

  • rohmen

    I knew people who were die hard cross country skiers who use to go up and ski the Bloomingdale before the 606 was constructed. Seems like the City is still trying to cater a little too hard to that crowd. Part of the problem of trying to build one trail that does everything.

    Rub here, though, is that the City took Federal commuting funds to build it. If you want it to be a recreating trail closed during winter for snow sport activities, that’s fine, but then don’t bill it off as a commuting route if you aren’t going to keep it in a condition where people can actually commute.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Actually, and unfortunately, it looks like even if a trail is funded by federal transportation grants, 24/7 access is not required: http://chi.streetsblog.org/2016/03/11/even-though-the-606-is-cmaq-funded-it-doesnt-have-to-be-open-247/

  • rohmen

    I agree. But, even if not legally enforceable, I do think how the Fed funds were awarded still provides a good reason for cyclists to raise a fuss and try to hold the City accountable for its decisions. It may not violate the letter of the law, but it sure does violate the spirit of it.

  • Mike

    John – who do we need to call / lobby / email / petition to pressure the PD to change this approach? As a runner I used this trail 5x a week during last winter.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    It couldn’t hurt to contact the local aldermen, especially if you live in one of their wards: Waguespack, Moreno, and Maldonado. Other ideas include calling 311, tweeting to the park district, and testifying at the next park district board meeting: http://www.chicagoparkdistrict.com/departments/board-of-commissioners/speaking-at-meetings/