People Will Win if Wrigley Field Streets are Closed to Vehicle Traffic

Addison & Clark
On game days, pedestrians fill the Addison/Clark intersection. Why bother keeping it open to vehicle traffic during these times? Photo: Peter Tauch

Two local politicians have proposed changing the streets around Wrigley Field to help defend it from terrorist attacks. Instead we should be looking at ways to protect the area from an excess of car traffic.

U.S. representative Mike Quigley (5th district) recently floated the idea of pedestrianizing Clark and Addison Streets during game days to prevent attacks. A spokesperson for Quigley clarified that while he hasn’t proposed anything specific yet, he’s interested in restricting private vehicle traffic during games but allowing buses and pedestrians to use Addison and Clark.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has previously rejected the idea of pedestrianizing these streets. But on Wednesday he announced he’d seek federal funding to widen the sidewalk on the south side (Addison) of the ballpark by four feet and add concrete bollards or planters to improve security.

“There [are] ways to achieve the security without shutting down Clark and Addison,” he told the Tribune. “We can do it in another way without all the other kind of ramifications that shutting down a major intersection [would entail].”

Quigley’s office released a statement yesterday endorsing Emanuel’s plan and offering help secure the federal funding.

While widening the sidewalk is a step in the right direction, more should be done to improve pedestrian and transit access to Wrigley. As it stands, motor vehicles can already barely get through Addison and Clark before and after games, when some 42,000 fans flood the intersection, and pedestrians in the street are at risk of being struck.

Wrigley Field 1935 World Series
A view of the transportation mix at Clark and Addison in 1935.

Setting aside the question of whether pedestrianizing the streets would thwart would-be car bombers, banning private vehicles on game days would make it easier for people to walk, take transit, and bike to Wrigley. It would also help prevent crashes and make the the area around the stadium a more vibrant public space.

There’s plenty of precedent for pedestrianizing major Chicago roadways for special events. During games and concerts at the United Center, Madison Street is closed for two blocks to all vehicle traffic except buses and taxis. And, of course, neighborhood fests are held annually on dozens of streets like Division, Chicago, and Cermak.

It makes little sense to allow drivers traffic to crawl through the Addison/Clark on Cubs game days. Most motorists are heading to or from parking areas that can be accessed via other routes.

And driving on game days, and all other days, in the neighborhood is about to become even less efficient. Construction will  start next month on a new mixed-use development at the southeast corner of Addison/Clark that will feature storage for 405 cars.

Also on deck are a new hotel at the northwest corner and a new plaza located between the stadium and Clark. When those projects are finished, there will be even more foot traffic in the area.

The Cubs team have already taken steps – some of them required by the 2013 agreement that allowed for the renovation and expansion the stadium – to encourage people not to bring cars into the neighborhood. They offer a complimentary bike valet near the ballpark, plus free remote car parking and shuttle bus service a couple of miles away

Eliminating car traffic at Addison/Clark would be another sensible measure to reduce Wrigleyville traffic congestion, encourage greener ways of getting to the ballpark, and improve the fan experience.

  • Yeah it is time to bite the bullet. Ban all cars all the time on the 3500 block of Clark and the 1000 block of Addison. Raise the streets into a giant table and only allow buses. Ban all parking all the time from 3500 to 3700 on Sheffield.

    Add a Brown line stop at Sheffield with both up and down escalators from the high up platform on the flyover.

  • David Henri

    Are we having a bad day Jeff?

  • What’s your thinking? Come on, put yourself out there.

    It’s the city. It’s what makes Wrigley special.

  • I grew up a mile by the park, and I say with 100% confidence that describing Clark or Addison as a “major artery” on game days for private vehicles is a position held by people who don’t actually drive through the area, because you only make that mistake once.

    I’m not sure why closing the streets is that big of a deal – we do that all over the North Side for dozens of street festivals that don’t have anywhere near the same volume of pedestrian traffic. Why not give this a try and see how it goes?

  • Brian

    Won’t the parking meter deal make this very difficult to pull off?

  • kastigar

    In addition to widening the sidewalk and reducing the traffic lanes, add a protected bike lane along the sidewalk as well. In addition to providing more isolation and protection from terrorists it would provide a means for more people to travel through the intersection.

  • How about a happy fun slide into the ballpark right from the L stop? Actually, make that two, and let’s have one be a water slide.

  • Obesa Adipose

    “There’s plenty of precedent for pedestrianizing major Chicago roadways for special events.” Minimum 80 days a season – not including concerts or other programming – doesn’t not constitute a “special event”.

  • Jeff Gio

    That’s ridiculous… if you build a sliding lane then delivery vehicles and LEO vehicles will just park in the lane. Then the slider is forced to dangerously maneuver around the parked vehicle. We need concrete buffers between sliding lanes and motorized vehicle traffic

  • Now you’re talking.

  • Not really. The parking deal got re-negotiated with some improvements for the city. Indeed with a little effort the city can begin to make money off of the deal. After a “top-up” amount is reached the city starts to make money. The top-up is at least partly calculated on revenues as a whole rather than just specific blocks. And of course there are lots of un-metered blocks in Chicago. Free parking is not a right so even placing metered parking on residential streets can be done.

    In any case I don’t think we are talking about all that many metered spaces.

  • Johnny Bench Called

    You might have missed this line:

    “During games and concerts at the United Center, Madison Street is closed for two blocks to all vehicle traffic except buses and taxis.”

    Between the Bulls and Blackhawks alone, that’s at least 82 days each year.

  • lol

  • What Jeff said.
    The city has found ways to get around it, that don’t involve just paying off the meters for the time they’re not used.
    They can be moved, and the city still has some space to add new meters where it receives the revenue, and that revenue can be used to pay off the meter company.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

There's no need for drivers to use Cornell or Marquette (southernmost east-west street in Jackson Park) to continue south on Stony Island. The Obama Library will be located on the patch of land currently occupied by a running track and baseball diamonds. Image: Google Maps

Why Pedestrianizing Jackson Park Roads Won’t Cause Carmaggedon

|
The Chicago Tribune recently reported that the Obama Foundation has proposed pedestrianizing stretches of the highway-like roads that run through Jackson Park, the future home of Barack Obama’s presidential library, to create a museum campus. The tone of the article, and quotes from some community members, suggest that this change would cause strangle transportation on […]

A Hard Decision: Should the Viagra Triangle Be Pedestrianized?

|
The Active Transportation Alliance’s recent call for 20 Chicago streets to be considered for partial or total pedestrianization has definitely got people talking. One idea that already has a bit of traction is pedestrianizing the upscale Gold Coast nightlife area centered around three-sided Mariano Park. This district, bounded by State, Rush, and Bellvue, is nicknamed […]