CMAP: Federal Housing Programs Won’t Fund Walkable Neighborhoods

Federal funding rules wouldn't give a loan guarantee for a mixed-use building like this one at Belmont and Southport. Photo: David Wilson
Federal funding rules wouldn't give a loan guarantee for a mixed-use building like this one at Belmont and Southport. Photo: David Wilson

The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning is the official regional planning agency for northeastern Illinois, and they’re required by federal law to design and maintain a comprehensive plan which guides how some federal grants are spent in Cook, DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will counties.

The organization is creating a new long-range plan called ON TO 2050, to be completed and adopted in October 2018. During the development of the plan, staff need to figure out what the priorities for land use and transportation in the region should be, and they’re gathering input by talking to hundreds of residents, organization leaders, and elected officials. Those talks are synthesized in early “strategy papers.”

The strategy paper Expanding Housing Choice (PDF) explores local and current issues that affect – and in some cases prevent – the preservation or construction of affordable housing in Chicago and the region.

One section about the federal role in supporting mixed-use and walkable neighborhoods caught my eye. It was actually about the lack of funding the federal government generally has for these neighborhoods, and how money is balanced in favor of single-use, single-family areas. Here’s the passage:

Americans increasingly prefer to live in walkable neighborhoods that mix commercial amenities with single-family, townhome, and multi-family homes (i.e. mixed-use neighborhoods). Yet, federal housing rules favor homeowners over renters and single-family homes over multifamily homes, and create policy barriers to market changes.

Specifically, CMAP planners write, projects with ground floor retail and apartments above frequently struggle to qualify for federal financing and loan guarantees. “The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs all limit the amount of non-residential space allowed within developments as a condition for receiving federal financing or loan guarantees.”

Freddie Mac rules, for example, allow a maximum of 20 percent for non-residential use. Therefore, “the building must be at least five stories to accommodate ground-floor retail.” That characteristic may make the building “out of scale with existing communities or noncompliant with existing zoning regulations.”

In other words, a property owner is allowed a very low maximum of commercial or retail space in a building when getting funding or guarantees from those federal programs.

The paper will probably have to be updated constantly as the current turmoil in the Trump administration will likely find its way to the housing department. But, hey, Trump’s Housing and Urban Development secretary Ben Carson will sort it out, even though he had zero experience in the field before he was appointed. After all, housing policy isn’t exactly brain surgery, right?

I’ve summarized the rest of the paper on Chicago Cityscape.

CMAP is holding meetings and public forums across the region this year and next, and will be collecting feedback until the plan is finalized in one and a half years.

wide banner

 

  • F. Hayek

    The lesson from this and federal policies since WWII is that if the government had never been involved in the housing market, not of the issues referenced here or historically would exist.

  • Uh, maybe. The suburbs might not exist, and people may not have left cities so quickly.
    There would probably be different issues, though.
    The fundamental issue is that the federal policy isn’t very flexible at all, or based on what people actually want to build or live in.

  • FlamingoFresh

    So is there anything being done to address or change these out of date federal funding guidelines? Is CMAP reaching out to plead their case?

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Preckwinkle, Environmental Groups Want CMAP to Drop Illiana

|
The Sierra Club and other organizations intend to petition the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning to remove the Illiana Tollway from its regional plan, effectively disallowing the state from building the new highway. The deletion is possible because CMAP, the federally-designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for this region, is finalizing a mandatory update of its GO […]

What Good Chicagoland Regional Planning Looks Like

|
By now, Streetsblog readers know all about how the Illiana Tollway, a proposed highway that will see little use and cost taxpayers $500 million, has messed up our regional plan. Last October, the MPO Policy Committee of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning voted to add the Illiana to the GO TO 2040 plan, allowing […]