Some Bus Service Will Be Better In 2016, But Better Funding Needed

Ashland Bus
The CTA has had to make tradeoffs to add more and faster bus service on Ashland Avenue. Photo: Daniel Rangel

2016 just might be the year of the Chicago bus. The Chicago Transit Authority is restoring express service and speeding up local service on Ashland and Western avenues, running six bus routes on dedicated bus lanes downtown with the new “Loop Link” corridor, and piloting restored service on the #11-Lincoln and #31-31st Street bus routes. Pace will also be gearing up to launch the Pulse “Arterial Bus Rapid Transit” service on Milwaukee Avenue in 2017.

The CTA discontinued express routes on Ashland, Western, and other streets in 2010. The 31st Street route was cut in the late 1990s, and the Lincoln route was truncated in 2012. Red-painted bus-lanes were installed on Loop streets in the 2000s, but the lanes weren’t enforced, and they were allowed to fade.

What accounts for the new focus on bus service? For starters, the Chicago Department of Transportation is currently implementing projects that Gabe Klein initiated when he was commissioner between 2011 and 2013. CDOT completed the east-west portion of Loop Link this month, and has begun constructing the Union Station transit center for people to transfer between buses and trains.

In addition to Loop Link, the restored Ashland and Western bus service, which includes the addition of transit-priority stoplights, can be viewed as laying the groundwork for a possible bus rapid transit line on Ashland. The city did outreach and planning for the system in the early years of the Emanuel administration, but it’s currently on the back burner.

The restoration of the #11 and #31 lines can be credited to tireless advocacy by local aldermen and a dedicated group of transit riders and businesses called the Crosstown Bus Coalition Last but not least, Dorval Carter took over as CTA president this year, and he said he wanted to pay more attention to improving bus service.

Service changes come with caveats

However, these bus service changes, past and present, have involved tradeoffs. When the CTA cut the #11 route in 2012, it was done as part of the agency’s so-called “decrowding plan,” which added service to ‘L’ lines, including the Brown Line, which roughly parallels Lincoln. The current Ashland and Western improvements are possible in part because the CTA is eliminating 100 management positions, including some some layoffs.

Bus ridership is not where it used to be. Last year, CTA attributed drops over the decade to the elimination of Chicago Card discounts, fare increases, and joblessness. Ventra card readers that are only semi-functional may have contributed to either fewer riders, or the reporting of fewer riders.

Bus service and ridership are down from 2008 levels. Data compiled by Metropolitan Planning Council.
Bus service and ridership are down from 2008 levels. Data compiled by Metropolitan Planning Council.

What’s ultimately clear is that the CTA is providing less bus service: buses come less frequently, for fewer hours a day, or both. It’s easy to think that the CTA is reducing its bus service because fewer people are riding the bus, but it’s also the case that fewer people ride the bus because the CTA provides less service – service frequency is freedom.

CTA itself in better financial situation

Relative to funding for operations, there doesn’t seem to be an end to funding for capital projects, especially from the federal government. They’re helping pay for new and rehabilitated buses (a program which the CTA has improved upon drastically since the legislative funding crisis in 2008); transit infrastructure like Loop Link; and the transit-priority signals that will speed up buses on Ashland and Western.

Bloated or inefficient operations isn’t CTA’s problem anymore. They have squeezed so much efficiency out of their total operation that the only thing left to do is cut either management staff – a bad idea because it gives them less capacity to plan service, and do customer service – or routes or service. A new approach is needed to ensure that people have access to reliable bus and train service that responds to residents’ preferred travel times and links up with suburban destinations.

It’s up to legislators to revise laws that distribute tax revenues so that transit – a transportation mode that’s more affordable and sustainable than building highways and buying the cars and fuel required to use them – gets more funding.

Operating funds versus capital projects

Finding funds for capital over operations isn’t a problem specific to Chicago, even though the region compares poorly among peers in how much money it dedicates to run buses and trains. The federal government, in doling out competitive grants through the TIGER program, sometimes gives money to cities and transit agencies for new transit lines that don’t guarantee minimum service levels that would secure a healthy ridership for said lines.

There’s work being done to generate more revenue for transit, but advocacy by riders, as we saw with the Crosstown Bus Coalition, it still important because the cities and agencies tend to focus on maintaining existing infrastructure and building more, not finding funding for more service.

The Metropolitan Planning Council leads the Accelerate Illinois campaign, which promotes raising the state gas tax to create a dedicated funding stream for maintaining existing rails, bridges, and roads, and building new infrastructure. The Transit Future campaign, led by the Active Transportation Alliance and the Center for Neighborhood Technology, calls for building new bus and rail rapid transit lines throughout Cook County with a new revenue stream that the county board would enact. The Chicagoland Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s FUND 2040 initiative has the same goal of building and maintaining infrastructure using an increase in sales tax.

Capitol Hill ended transit operations assistance decades ago, and while there’s still room to change, it may be more effective to advocate for better transit operations funding at the city, county, and state level. Yet, currently, all three local campaigns focus on capital projects.

donate button
Did you appreciate this post? Streetsblog Chicago is currently funded until April 2016. Consider making a donation through our PublicGood site to help ensure we can continue to publish next year.

  • No one was calling for BRT on Ashland, nor was BRT needed, until CTA eliminated the Ashland express route. Why would BRT be needed now, and why would anyone pay to build it, once the Ashland express is restored? Loop Link I can see. (Except for that pesky, “Oops, we forgot to engineer a way for bus mirrors not to kill people on high platforms” problem.) Ashland BRT seems like an unnecessary idea now.

  • johnaustingreenfield
  • Little Nipper

    The elimination of Ashland express routes was a reason the RTA/CTA used for a BRT (and all the money spent on planning) – which made no sense on this route,
    The downtown BRT/Looplink was needed decades ago, but of course remember to duck. In a serious situation is how will people with low vision, and those that are blind going to know of impending buses on the looplink? What’s the purpose of the current CTA ADA Advisory Committee, which is chaired by a retired CTA employee?

  • Many years ago I took Ashland in my car to drive my daughters to school in the morning. There were then several intersections where the traffic was backed up one to three full blocks. In those conditions no bus express or regular is going to go fast. Only BRT on dedicated lanes can do it.

    Ashland is a quintessential urban/city street. It needs to service Transit not automobiles. It is the city not the suburbs.

  • Even with all of the improvements that the CTA is making on the Ashland and Western express *and* local routes, BRT on Ashland would still be faster.

    I don’t know anything about the CTA’s ADA advisory committee.
    I think that the blind would know to stay away from bus platform edges in a similar way they do on train platform edges: the tactile rubber strip.

  • What do you mean no one was calling for BRT on Ashland?

    For starters, the Metropolitan Planning Council identified 10 streets in 2011 on which BRT could and should be installed because of its lower-than-rail costs but same-as-rail speeds.

    Chicago planners have been talking about BRT there and elsewhere before 2010, and probably before 2008, when it was announced that Chicago would get NYC’s missed congestion pricing money from the federal government.

    What I think people want is more reliable, faster service – always and everywhere. That people weren’t asking for specific technologies on specific streets isn’t relevant.

    Ashland BRT went through a public consultation period and the public spoke, er, spooked Rahm into holding back implementation. That’s when you really started seeing people calling for better transit on Ashland, when they were provided a choice to be given it.

  • Little Nipper

    so how is the CTA going to inform those with visual impairments of the apparent danger? Will be happy to meet with you with people with visual impairments to plan and propose some real concerns and solutions.

  • Joseph Rappold

    i was calling for BRT on both

  • david vartanoff

    Maybe the Red painted lanes as Jeffery has for rush hour. BRT has always been the lipstick on a bus excuse for not doing real (that’s RAIL) transit where the ridership deserves it. The challenge at this point is whether CTA will do the transit signal priority/queue jumps along with the restoration of express service or insist on waiting for BRT. If the TSP doesn’t improve throughput, then the argument for dedicated lanes will have more justification.

    PS, I was only driven to school on rare occasions even in suburbia; In an urban setting with decent transit, the kids I helped raise took the city bus.

  • I drove to work anyway and it was on my way. My excuse for driving has always been the time savings. Time counts a lot with kids. Then too I could afford to drive. Of course, when the weather was really bad I would sometimes take the el to work or if the car was in the shop. In those senses I was a “foul weather” friend of transit. These days I use my Ventra card to go downtown once a week in the evenings because of parking expense or if I want to drink.

    To me BRT is a slippery-slope to rail. If is done right and works successfully then eventually it becomes rail, imo. Where it doesn’t become successful enough to become rail, then hopefully it remains BRT rather than getting demoted back to Express Bus or worse. As far as I am concerned every major arterial, the one mile arterials, (North, Fullerton, Belmont, Irving, Lawrence, Ashland, Western and Cicero) with a bus route ought be a BRT with a dedicated lane, at least in the densest urban environments. Kick out the street parking and buy up residential lots on the allies behind the businesses to replace it. Etc.

  • neroden

    Please look up the word “tactile”.

    The worry is more people who have no visual impairments, since the tactile strips have no color contrast.

  • Little Nipper

    neroden, who are you replying to?

  • > Ventra card readers that are only semi-functional may have contributed to either fewer riders, or the reporting of fewer riders.

    I live downstate, but I get up to Chicago relatively often. I took the Western Ave bus from 18th to North on the evening of December 26 and was amazed by how many people the driver waved onto the bus after their Ventra cards didn’t work. I have no way of knowing what caused their Ventra cards’ failures (technical error, insufficient funds, etc.), but the driver allowed them on without paying.

    The CTA has automated counters keeping track of people getting on and off buses, right? I’d be very curious to see a comparison of payments versus boardings. Seemed like 40% of people that one night didn’t end up paying.

  • Gilberto
  • Little Nipper

    neroden slowly move away from the keyboard, you might hurt self by replying to that you do not understand.

  • Little Nipper

    Maybe take some time and volunteer at the Chicago Lighthouse or Blind Services to understand issues as they actually affect others , then next time you feel you must reply to that you know nothing about, you might actually have something to add.

  • johnaustingreenfield

    Folks, please keep the discussion polite. Thanks.

  • Downtown subway and improvements to the bus service will benefit the entire DART system, not just the city.”We aren’t being selfish here?
    Joan Carrigan

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG