Divvy Bike-Share Hopes Expanded Area, Outreach Also Expands Appeal

Damen/Pierce Divvy station being installed
Divvy installation crews will be visiting many more neighborhoods next year as the system grows by 75 percent. Photo: Steven Vance.

The December meeting of the Mayor’s Bicycle Advisory Committee included lots of news about the future of the Divvy program. Ever since the bike-share program launched on June 28, 2013, 3.1 million users, including 23,177 annual members and many daily users, have biked over 6.6 million miles starting at 300 stations.

A previously planned expansion will bring the system to 475 stations, 4750 bikes and 31 wards. That will broaden the service area’s edges to Touhy Avenue (7200 North) to 75th Street (7500 South), from the lake to as far west as Pulaski (4000 West). State grant money has been allocated for an additional 50 stations, further extending Divvy north through Rogers Park into Evanston, and west through Garfield Park and Austin into Oak Park.

A new member survey will be going out soon. Last winter’s survey showed a disappointing lack of diversity among annual members, who were 65 percent male, 79 percent white, 93 percent college educated, and averaged 34 years old. Divvy hopes that a larger coverage area, continued outreach, and efforts to increase access for the unbanked will improve diversity among both annual members and daily users.

Divvy has launched an equity initiative that applies to station siting, public outreach, hiring, and youth training. In the first two years, station siting prioritized locations with perceived high demand. The priority now is being shifted to create a higher density network of stations throughout the Divvy service area, so that lower density neighborhoods of color (where current stations are sometimes a mile apart) will be better served. The goal for both infill and expansion of the service area is for stations to be no more than half a mile apart, putting Divvy within a five minute walk of everyone within the service area.

Outreach to community leaders is planned, which will help build community connections to the program. This could be through neighborhood organizations and programs, as well as citywide efforts such as Red Bike & Green or Slow Roll.

A Design a Divvy contest will be aimed at neighborhoods where Divvy will be introduced in 2015. The contest would seek neighborhood-specific graphic designs for bikes in areas getting new service, raising awareness of Divvy and helping to build community interest.

On the employment side, Divvy will continue employment diversity and youth training partnerships with three programs: GreenCorps for adults and youth, and Skills for Chicagoland’s Future. GreenCorps’ youth program helps students ages 16 to 19 in neighborhoods with a high risk of violence. The adult programs work with people facing barriers to employment.

Divvy for Everyone (D4E) is a new program being developed to study ways to increase Divvy’s availability to the unbanked. Since the majority of CTA users are now using Ventra for fare payment, its debit-card function could provide a viable way for daily users to access the system, although the card’s high fees may be a concern. Ventra and Divvy keys are based on similar technology, so it’s also possible that a Ventra card could eventually substitute for a key.

Thoughtful questions were raised at the meeting in relation to Divvy and Streets for Cycling 2020. For instance, gaps in the bike route network, and poorly maintained bikeways, might affect use of both Divvy and personal bikes in black communities, and it might prove difficult to effectively promote bicycling as transportation in communities that lack a solid network of rideable routes. Divvy could also try to analyze credit card data from daily users to get a sense of how their demographics may differ from annual members.

The 2015 expansion of Divvy, and new partnerships with neighborhood leaders, organizations and programs, have the potential to make Divvy an accessible, practical form of transportation for a wider range of Chicago’s population and neighborhoods.

  • what_eva

    Nitpick – stations 1/2 mile apart does not put everyone within 5 minute walk (1/4 mile) of a station, it puts everyone within 10 minute walk (1/2 mile) of a station, because someone could be 1/4 mile from a station both N/S *and* E/W.

    Example: There are stations now at (roughly) 47th/King, 47th/Cottage Grove, and 51st/Cottage Grove. No station at 51st/King, but if added, that would be 1/2 mile stations. A person who lives at 49th/St Lawrence would be 1/2 mile from any of those stations.

  • Yes, those unlucky enough to live dead-center of the grid voids have a longer walk. Another calculation you could do is the average and median walk based on that grid.

  • what_eva

    My point is that the article says:

    “The goal for both infill and expansion of the service area is for
    stations to be no more than half a mile apart, putting Divvy within a
    five minute walk of everyone within the service area.”

    Which is a false statement. If population density within a grid were equal, the average person would have a 1/4 mile walk. I don’t know, but I would guess that’s false and density is likely higher closer to the 1/2 mile arterials (ie larger buildings near arterials, single family homes in the centers of a given grid), which would mean it’s less than 1/4 mile for the average person, but that’s not my point. The average is not *everyone*.

  • I understand what you’re saying but I think you’ll understand that there’s a fair amount of simplification that Divvy is going to offer us in their explanation and in the way we convert that to sentences in our articles.

    Another problem that using radius boundaries introduces is that our buildings – our lives – are built on a Manhattan grid, so really Divvy (and CTA, and CDOT, etc.) should be using a metric that puts everyone within 1/2 mile (let’s talk in objective units) considering that they’ll have to walk up and over, and not through walls and yards.

    Calculating Manhattan distance is a piece of cake: you’re just calculating the difference between north and south bounds, and adding it to the distance of the difference between east and west bounds. Details.

  • Anne A

    Oops – small correction to the first paragraph. That’s 3.1 million TRIPS, not users.

  • psyber

    What do you streetsblogers think are the chances of Divvy installing a station at the Roosevelt Collection/Target in the south loop? It was on the original list of planned stations but doesn’t appear on the expansion map released – despite the high number of requests on their suggestion map. According to Google Maps the current stations on Roosevelt are 0.8 miles apart, the whole area is a Divvy black hole

  • what_eva

    Oh, I understand that you’re using what Divvy gives you, it’s more a complaint toward their PR. If they’re really using radius instead of grid/realistic walking distance, they need a dose of reality. If they’re just dumb and using “oh they’re 1/2 mile apart so nobody is more than 1/4 mile away” as my post implies, they also need a dose of reality. There’s simply no need for them to butcher this stuff. 10 minutes isn’t unreasonable for less dense parts of the city.

  • southsidecyclist

    Bikeshare without bike lanes/paths is like a train without rails. There are intersections, viaducts & bridges in this city that will not be crossed by the casual cyclist without being re-engineered. An equitable expansion plan for this city might place a Divvy installation near each CTA/Metra transit station and another 1/2 mile to each side. Plop an installation into each shopping area of 15+ concentrated businesses and 1/2 mile in each cardinal direction. Then lets set one at each Public Library. When we have Bike lanes to support this we will have a true system. When a farmer wants to grow a crop he doesn’t just throw seed into the forest, He clears, plows and sows.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

CDOT’s Sean Wiedel Provides an Update on Divvy Installation, Equity Efforts

|
“With all the challenges we’ve had with the equipment supplier, it’s gratifying to finally see the new Divvy stations on the ground,” said Chicago Department of Transportation assistant commissioner Sean Wiedel regarding the city’s current bike-share expansion. “People are obviously clamoring for Divvy, so it’s exciting to be able to meet that demand.” CDOT began installing […]

Rogers Parkers Discuss Plans for Divvy Stations, Greenway

|
The city is gearing up to add 175 more Divvy bike-share stations this year, bringing the total to 475. On Thursday, 49th Ward Alderman Joe Moore hosted a community meeting at Eugene Field elementary to discuss potential Divvy station locations within Rogers Park. The meeting also covered the proposed north-south neighborhood greenway that’s a ballot item […]