IDOT Prepares to Ram Through Another Expensive Highway Project

congestion skyline
The Illiana will have a negligible effect on Chicago-area traffic congestion, but an enormous effect on state finances and regional sprawl. Photo: Eric Rogers

The Illinois Department of Transportation is again seeking the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s help to build an expensive highway expansion that isn’t included in the region’s planning blueprint. This time, it’s not about a putting a flyover above Halsted Street and a wall in front of people’s homes, like the agency plans to do with the Circle Interchange expansion. IDOT, along with the Indiana Department of Transportation, needs approvals from several CMAP committees and the full board so the two agencies can spend $2.75 billion building a brand new four-lane highway in southern Will County.

According to the project website, the justification for the Illiana is to relieve traffic on the nearest expressways, give freight traffic a bypass around Chicago’s congested highways, and give access to a new airport in Peotone that Governor Quinn has been trying to build. The agencies also say the project would accommodate population growth — they think people will continue moving to greenfield exurbs. But this assumes that public policy has no influence on where people live, and can’t improve housing and transportation options in established communities.

The bottom line is that the highway is unaffordable and would perpetuate sprawl.

Gov. Quinn Announces Re-Opening of Congress Parkway Bridge
Governor Quinn's "jobs plan" calls for spending exorbitant sums on new highways that will harm the Chicago region. Photo: Governor's office.

CMAP staff, tasked with reviewing the project for the committee and board members who must vote on it, issued an evaluation in late July [PDF] and are asking for public comment through September 3. While the CMAP report doesn’t deliver a straight up-or-down verdict, it does make clear that regional planners have a far more critical view of the project than IDOT does.

As Greg Hinz at Crain’s reported earlier this month, CMAP projects that the Illiana will induce only one-fifth as much economic activity as IDOT projects [PDF]. CMAP also casts doubt on IDOT’s $2.75 billion pricetag, which works out to a much lower cost per mile than comparable road projects in the region, and calls out the financial risk of the project, which would need to be paid for with tolls or public sector payments to contractors. Overall, Hinz wrote, CMAP has made the “highly unusual” decision to “publicly ding a proposed major transportation project.”

This is exactly what CMAP should be doing in this case. The agency is guided by the GO TO 2040 regional plan — created by thousands of participants and approved by hundreds of municipalities — which emphasizes development and growth in existing areas. It’s CMAP’s job to analyze all projects according to the methods it has developed over decades and to vet all projects by identical metrics and their pertinence to the regional comprehensive plan.

Meanwhile, IDOT projects that more of the region’s growth will occur in “outlying, undeveloped areas,” then agitates to build roads in those areas before people move there. If IDOT gets their way, it becomes a self-fullfilling prophecy: projecting sprawling growth, then building highways to accommodate that growth, then watching as the highways induce the sprawl the agency predicted.

As CMAP notes in its report, the Illiana project won’t even alleviate congestion in the region as more private cars “backfill the space vacated by trucks.” All this does is generate traffic, create higher infrastructure costs, and compel people to live where it’s harder and more expensive to access jobs.

How much longer can Illinois continue to shell out billions on damaging highway projects while its credit rating plummets? If freight movement is so important, non-freight should be tolled.

In a related development, Openlands, Sierra Club and Midewin Heritage Association have sued the Federal Highway Administration for approving the Environmental Impact Study submitted by IDOT and INDOT, saying it fails to establish a need for the road, properly evaluate alternative routes, “undermines approved comprehensive regional land use and transportation plans,” and “threatens globally significant wildlife habitats” including the Kankakee River (which would likely become a water source for all of the new communities) and Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie.

The CMAP committees and board will consider IDOT’s project in their October meetings. Hinz writes that “it will be fascinating to see if the agency actually sticks to its guns and resists pressure to give the project a pass [like it did for the Circle Interchange]. That’s what usually happens in Illlinois.” And that’s what people in Chicagoland should be afraid of.

You can submit your comment to CMAP on this proposed capital plan amendment by e-mail, calling 312-454-0400, or writing to CMAP, ATTN Plan and TIP amendments, 233 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 800, Chicago IL 60606.

Job and housing growth according to IDOT versus CMAP
Job and housing growth projections according to IDOT versus CMAP. IDOT is predicting significantly more growth in the outer parts of the region, and agitating to build highway projects that will facilitate that growth.
  • Mike Hammett

    I disagree with your above hate for the Illiana, but I do agree with the improvement of rail. We had a boom 100 years ago, then a crash. Now no one can afford to buildimprove rail because of all of the development.

  • Driver

    More routes means traffic will be dispersed between them as opposed to all jammed up on one of them. It is quite apparent you are against the idea so no argument will change your mind. That’s alright. I still look forward to this road being built. Also, I should mention that I have encountered backups on that section of I-80/94 at various times of day so unless you’d like me to start driving overnight, telling me to change the time of day I travel is not going to help much. I’m hopeful this project is able to come to fruition. In the meantime I will continue to support all styles of transportation. I ride a bike. I take trains. I use the public transit system when possible. I am all for all of those. I also drive a lot and when there is an opportunity to improve that traveling experience, just like I would the other methods of travel, I support it. Thank you.

  • Anonymous

    I am hopeful that we will not waste billions of dollars on yet another highway boondoggle.

    We have the benefit of hindsight yet continue to make the same mistakes over and over.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

The Case of IDOT’s Mysterious Extra Highway Lane

|
In a move that has baffled and frustrated residents of 400 S Green Street, the Illinois Department of Transportation has apparently ruled out a version of the Circle Interchange expansion project that would avoid building a new, elevated highway ramp above Halsted Street. At an April 3 hearing on the project, IDOT told residents the […]

Metra and Pace Vote For Transit-Crushing Illiana Tollway in Advisory Meeting

|
Chicago-area transportation organizations are poised to shoot themselves in the foot and harm the region by allowing the Illinois Department of Transportation Department to squander limited transportation infrastructure funds on the $2.75 billion Illiana Tollway. On Friday the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s transportation committee voted to recommend moving forward with this wasteful, destructive project, […]